Paper · 1996 · Weed Science

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control with Imazethapyr and Haloxyfop in Conventional and Vertical-tilled Soybean (Glycine max)

Hector J. Tassara; Jose Santoro; Mircza C. De Seiler; et al.

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies in conventional and vertical-tilled soybeans were conducted in 1992/93 and 1993/94 at four locations in Argentina to compare the efficacy of imazethapyr and haloxyfop for johnsongrass control. Control was evaluated by measuring frequency of johnsongrass-infested areas at the beginning of the 1992/93 and 1993/94 growing seasons. Relative johnsongrass leaf area and number of rhizome phytomers within infested areas also was evaluated. Herbicide application reduced frequency of infested areas in the 1992/93 growing season. Frequency of infested areas increased in check plots. No differences were found among herbicide treatments, suggesting that the effect of imazethapyr was as high as that observed for specific graminicides. Reduction in frequency of infested areas caused by herbicide treatments was accompanied to some extent by a decrease in intensity of infestation within infested patches assessed by measuring johnsongrass relative leaf area. Phytomer population levels, on the other hand, were reduced only after two consecutive years of herbicide application. No differences were found among herbicide treatments in terms of impact on both measures of weed abundance. Johnsongrass responded similarly to all treatments regardless of tillage system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application reduced the frequency of johnsongrass-infested soybean areas in 1992/93.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee2weede0
Outcome
frequency of infested arease0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
1992/93 growing seasone0
Setting
Argentinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide application reduced frequency of infested areas in the 1992/93 growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“Argentina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“johnsongrass-infested areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The frequency of johnsongrass-infested areas increased in check plots.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1weed
Outcome
Frequency of infested arease0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frequency of infested areas increased in check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“johnsongrass-infested areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide treatments did not differ in control efficacy.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
imazethapyre0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1weed
Outcome
johnsongrass controle1
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
specific graminicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were found among herbicide treatments, suggesting that the effect of imazethapyr was as high as that observed for specific graminicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“johnsongrass control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments decreased johnsongrass relative leaf area within infested patches to some extent.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
johnsongrass relative leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
to some extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in frequency of infested areas caused by herbicide treatments was accompanied to some extent by a decrease in intensity of infestation within infested patches assessed by measuring johnsongrass relative leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Johnsongrass phytomer population levels declined only after two consecutive years of herbicide use.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
two consecutive years of herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1weed
Outcome
Phytomer population levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytomer population levels, on the other hand, were reduced only after two consecutive years of herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“johnsongrass relative leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments did not differ in their impact on the two measures of weed abundance.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1weed
Outcome
both measures of weed abundancee0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were found among herbicide treatments in terms of impact on both measures of weed abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“johnsongrass relative leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Johnsongrass responded similarly to all treatments regardless of tillage system.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
JohnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
Johnsongrass responded similarlye0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Johnsongrass responded similarly to all treatments regardless of tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–129 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · Sorghum halepense · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · Sorghum halepense · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.