Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

CHEMICAL THINNING OF APRICOT CULTIVARS: PROMISING PRELIMINARY RESULTS

D. Christen; G. Devènes; E. Chassot; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the phytotoxicity and the thinning efficacy of ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) and of 6-benzyladenine (BA). In 2007 and in 2008, ATS was applied twice at a concentration of 1.3% (w/v) on the cultivars Orangered, Kioto, Robada, Goldrich, Bergeron, Harostar and Bergarouge. Benzyladenine was applied in 2007 at the end of the blossom and 25 days after at a concentration of 0.75% (v/v) on the cultivars Orangered, Bergarouge and on the hybrid FG4353, and one application was performed in 2008 on Harostar and Bergarouge. No phytotoxicity was induced by these applications independently of the cultivar. Benzyladenine and ATS treated trees exhibited an enhanced fruit drop. A reduction of 50% to 20% using BA and of 65% to 20% using ATS was observed in the number of fruits per linear meter relatively to the untreated plants. Fruit size was enhanced using ATS but, surprisingly, not for BA-treated trees. These results are promising in order to regulate crop load of apricot cultivars. The reasonability of chemical thinning in apricot is discussed, with respect to fruit size, cultivar differences, phenological stage and number of applications, as well as to climatic, technical and economic aspects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ATS and BA applications did not induce phytotoxicity across cultivars.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
these applicationse0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No phytotoxicity was induced by these applications independently of the cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzyladenine treatment enhanced apricot fruit drop.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Benzyladeninee0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzyladenine and ATS treated trees exhibited an enhanced fruit drop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATS treatment enhanced apricot fruit drop.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
ATSe0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzyladenine and ATS treated trees exhibited an enhanced fruit drop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA reduced fruit number per linear meter by 50% to 20% relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
BAe0
Outcome
number of fruits per linear metere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50% to 20%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction of 50% to 20% using BA and of 65% to 20% using ATS was observed in the number of fruits per linear meter relatively to the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATS reduced fruit number per linear meter by 65% to 20% relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
ATSe0
Outcome
number of fruits per linear metere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
65% to 20%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction of 50% to 20% using BA and of 65% to 20% using ATS was observed in the number of fruits per linear meter relatively to the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATS enhanced apricot fruit size.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
ATSe0
Outcome
Fruit sizee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit size was enhanced using ATS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA did not enhance apricot fruit size.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
BA-treatede0
Outcome
Fruit sizee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit size was enhanced using ATS but, surprisingly, not for BA-treated trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ammonium thiosulfate · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.