Paper · 2015 · eScholarship (California Digital Library)

MULTITROPHIC INTERACTIONS AND THE EXOTIC LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH, EPIPHYAS POSTVITTANA, IN CALIFORNIA

Julie V. Hopper

20
claims
47
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Invasive species are recognized as one of the main drivers of global environmental change. The majority of invasive species escape from their coevolved natural enemies (predators, parasitoids and parasites), but in some cases can either act as a transport vector for coevolved parasites, or encounter biotic resistance from resident competitors or enemies, in a new region. When resident enemies are unable to suppress an invasive species, specialist natural enemies from the native range can be imported and implemented to reduce its abundance in a novel environment (classical biological control). As top-down effects of natural enemies can interact with bottom-up effects from host plants, it is of increasing interest to understand how multitrophic interactions influence the suppression of invasive species. The light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), provides a unique opportunity to examine mechanisms for the suppression of an exotic species and in the context of novel multitrophic interactions. Native to Australia, E. postvittana is a highly polyphagous leafroller that was confirmed to be present in coastal California in 2006. For my dissertation research I have focused on several different aspects of the trophic interactions among E. postvittana and its natural enemies. Firstly, I investigated the occurrence and fitness consequences of infanticide for Goniozus jacintae Farrugia, a coevolved gregarious larval ectoparasitoid of E. postvittana. Bethylid parasitoids, such as G. jacintae, have long been recognized for their aggressive adult behavior and their use of infanticide to kill the offspring of competing females. In this laboratory study I investigated the clutch size and handling time of G. jacintae, compared its life history performance between primary and secondary (laid after infanticide events) broods, and estimated lipid and protein concentrations in the hemolymph of non-parasitized and parasitized hosts. I found that secondary clutches were significantly larger than primary clutches in ovicide treatments and also experienced greater brood survivorship. Lipid concentrations were consistently higher in the hemolymph of parasitized hosts and protein concentrations were also higher until egg hatch when parasitoid larvae began to consume the resources available. This study was the first to provide evidence that improved nutritional quality could be an important benefit of infanticide for an insect parasitoid, allowing for larger clutch size and improved brood survivorship among secondary broods. Subsequently, I discovered a microsporidian pathogen infecting field populations of E. postvittana in California and I investigated both its identity and pathogenicity. Using ultrastructure of different spore stages in the life cycle and phylogenetic analysis of sequences from selected genetic markers (ITS, SSU and RPB1), I was able to confirm that the microsporidian was a member of the Nosema fumiferanae species complex (N. fumiferanae postvittana subsp. n.). I was also able to confirm that this microsporidian can be vertically transmitted and that it has significant negative effects on the life-history performance of E. postvittana under laboratory conditions. To further explore the potential of this microsporidian infection to provide biotic resistance to the invasiveness of E. postvittana, I further examined its pathogenicity in the context of dose-response relationships and the latent period of infection in the laboratory, and quantified pathogen prevalence and intensity in the field using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for five populations in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. In the laboratory, the median lethal dose (LD50) was estimated to be 1.8 x 104 spores, the mean latent period for infection with 103 spores was 12.67 days, and compared to healthy larvae, those infected with up to 105 spores showed a reduction in intrinsic rate of natural increase from 0.18 to 0.008. From the field sampling I detected N. fumiferanae postvittana in all five populations with an overall prevalence of 5% and a mean microsporidian intensity of 226 spores. Although the laboratory results demonstrated the potential for host suppression, the field sampling indicated that the prevalence and intensity were too low to account for the continued decline in population densities of E. postvittana in coastal California. Finally, I investigated the role of multitrophic interactions among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California. In a common garden experiment in the field, parasitism rates of egg masses and larvae by resident parasitoids in the field were found to vary among host plant species, with a higher probability of egg parasitism on taller plants and a higher probability of larval parasitism on shorter plants. In the laboratory, parasitoid search time for an egg mass varied among plant species, but longer search times did not necessarily correspond to lower rates of egg parasitism in the field. When controlling for plant species, the probability of a parasitoid contacting an egg mass decreased with increasing trichome density. I also found significant effects of plant diet on the fitness of both healthy and microsporidian-infected E. postvittana larvae under laboratory conditions, with evidence of synergistic effects between diet and infection for some host plant species. Overall, I demonstrated significant variation in the extent of enemy-free space for E. postvittana based on plant species, but not plant origin. My dissertation highlights the importance of biotic resistance in buffering a resident community against an exotic invader and demonstrates that this resistance is often dependent on complex multitrophic interactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary parasitoid clutches were larger than primary clutches in ovicide treatments.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
ovicide treatmentse1
Interactor
Goniozus jacintaeGoniozus jacintaee3biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
E. postvittanaEpiphyas postvittanae3pest
Outcome
clutch sizee2
Direction
largere1
Comparator
primary clutchese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Goniozus jacintae
Goniozus jacintae · InteractorMike Bowie · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Epiphyas postvittana
Epiphyas postvittana · Second interactorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I found that secondary clutches were significantly larger than primary clutches in ovicide treatments and also experienced greater brood survivorship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2135 · show in text ↑
e2

“I investigated the clutch size and handling time of G. jacintae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1770 · show in text ↑
e3

“for Goniozus jacintae Farrugia, a coevolved gregarious larval ectoparasitoid of E. postvittana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid and protein concentrations in the hemolymph were higher in parasitized hosts; lipid was consistently higher.

Taxon
host plantse0
Organ / stage
hemolymphe4
Treatment
parasitized hostse4
Outcome
Lipid concentrationse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
non-parasitizede5

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lipid concentrations were consistently higher in the hemolymph of parasitized hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2137–2220 · show in text ↑
e5

“estimated lipid and protein concentrations in the hemolymph of non-parasitized and parasitized hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–1984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein concentrations in the hemolymph of parasitized hosts were higher until egg hatch.

Taxon
host plantse0
Organ / stage
hemolymphe5
Treatment
parasitized hostse4
Outcome
protein concentrationse6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
until egg hatche6
Comparator
non-parasitizede5

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lipid concentrations were consistently higher in the hemolymph of parasitized hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2137–2220 · show in text ↑
e5

“estimated lipid and protein concentrations in the hemolymph of non-parasitized and parasitized hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–1984 · show in text ↑
e6

“protein concentrations were also higher until egg hatch when parasitoid larvae began to consume the resources available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The microsporidian was identified as a member of the Nosema fumiferanae species complex.

Taxon
host plantse0
Interactor
microsporidiane1pathogen
Outcome
member of the Nosema fumiferanae species complexe1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I was able to confirm that the microsporidian was a member of the Nosema fumiferanae species complex (N. fumiferanae postvittana subsp. n.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2908–3047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The microsporidian can be vertically transmitted in E. postvittana.

Taxon
host plantse0
Interactor
this microsporidiane1pathogen
Outcome
vertically transmittede1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I was also able to confirm that this microsporidian can be vertically transmitted and that it has significant negative effects on the life-history performance of E. postvittana under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3049–3253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The microsporidian has significant negative effects on the life-history performance of E. postvittana under laboratory conditions.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
this microsporidiane1
Interactor
E. postvittanaEpiphyas postvittanae1pest
Second interactor
this microsporidiane1pathogen
Outcome
life-history performancee1
Direction
negative effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Epiphyas postvittana
Epiphyas postvittana · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I was also able to confirm that this microsporidian can be vertically transmitted and that it has significant negative effects on the life-history performance of E. postvittana under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3049–3253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The median lethal dose (LD50) of the microsporidian for larvae was 1.8 x 104 spores.

Taxon
host plantse0
Outcome
median lethal dose (LD50)e1
Value
1.8 x 104 sporese1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the laboratory, the median lethal dose (LD50) was estimated to be 1.8 x 104 spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3694–3779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean latent period for infection with 103 spores was 12.67 days.

Taxon
host plantse0
Outcome
mean latent period for infectione1
Value
12.67 dayse1
Qualifier
with 103 sporese1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“the mean latent period for infection with 103 spores was 12.67 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3781–3848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection with up to 105 spores reduced the intrinsic rate of natural increase from 0.18 to 0.008 compared with healthy larvae.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
infected with up to 105 sporese1
Outcome
intrinsic rate of natural increasee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
from 0.18 to 0.008e1
Comparator
healthy larvaee1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to healthy larvae, those infected with up to 105 spores showed a reduction in intrinsic rate of natural increase from 0.18 to 0.008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3854–3994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall prevalence of N. fumiferanae postvittana in field populations was 5%.

Taxon
host plantse0
Interactor
N. fumiferanae postvittanaNosema fumiferanaee1pathogen
Outcome
overall prevalencee1
Value
5%e1
Setting
San Francisco Bay Area of Californiae2

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“From the field sampling I detected N. fumiferanae postvittana in all five populations with an overall prevalence of 5% and a mean microsporidian intensity of 226 spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3996–4164 · show in text ↑
e2

“for five populations in the San Francisco Bay Area of California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3628–3692 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean microsporidian intensity in field populations was 226 spores.

Taxon
host plantse0
Interactor
N. fumiferanae postvittanaNosema fumiferanaee1pathogen
Outcome
mean microsporidian intensitye1
Value
226 sporese1
Setting
San Francisco Bay Area of Californiae2

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“From the field sampling I detected N. fumiferanae postvittana in all five populations with an overall prevalence of 5% and a mean microsporidian intensity of 226 spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3996–4164 · show in text ↑
e2

“for five populations in the San Francisco Bay Area of California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3628–3692 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism of egg masses by resident parasitoids was higher on taller host plants.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
taller plantse1
Interactor
resident parasitoidse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
probability of egg parasitisme1
Direction
highere1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“parasitism rates of egg masses and larvae by resident parasitoids in the field were found to vary among host plant species, with a higher probability of egg parasitism on taller plants and a higher probability of larval parasitism on shorter plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4610–4858 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism of larvae by resident parasitoids was higher on shorter host plants.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
shorter plantse1
Interactor
resident parasitoidse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
probability of larval parasitisme1
Direction
highere1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“parasitism rates of egg masses and larvae by resident parasitoids in the field were found to vary among host plant species, with a higher probability of egg parasitism on taller plants and a higher probability of larval parasitism on shorter plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4610–4858 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer parasitoid search times did not necessarily correspond to lower rates of egg parasitism in the field.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
longer search timese1
Outcome
rates of egg parasitisme1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“longer search times did not necessarily correspond to lower rates of egg parasitism in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4950–5046 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The probability of a parasitoid contacting an egg mass decreased with increasing trichome density, controlling for plant species.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
trichome densitye1
Interactor
parasitoide1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
probability of a parasitoid contacting an egg masse1
Direction
decreasede1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“When controlling for plant species, the probability of a parasitoid contacting an egg mass decreased with increasing trichome density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5048–5181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant diet had significant effects on the fitness of healthy and microsporidian-infected E. postvittana larvae.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
plant diete1
Interactor
E. postvittanaEpiphyas postvittanae1pest
Second interactor
microsporidiane1pathogen
Outcome
fitnesse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Epiphyas postvittana
Epiphyas postvittana · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I also found significant effects of plant diet on the fitness of both healthy and microsporidian-infected E. postvittana larvae under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5183–5338 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant diet and microsporidian infection showed synergistic effects on E. postvittana fitness for some host plant species.

Taxon
host plant speciese1
Treatment
diet and infectione1
Outcome
synergistic effectse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“with evidence of synergistic effects between diet and infection for some host plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5340–5431 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enemy-free space for E. postvittana varied significantly among plant species.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
plant speciese1
Interactor
E. postvittanaEpiphyas postvittanae1pest
Outcome
extent of enemy-free spacee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Epiphyas postvittana
Epiphyas postvittana · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I demonstrated significant variation in the extent of enemy-free space for E. postvittana based on plant species, but not plant origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5442–5576 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enemy-free space for E. postvittana did not vary with plant origin.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
plant origine1
Outcome
extent of enemy-free spacee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I demonstrated significant variation in the extent of enemy-free space for E. postvittana based on plant species, but not plant origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5442–5576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary broods of the parasitoid had greater brood survivorship than primary broods.

Taxon
host plantse0
Treatment
ovicide treatmentse1
Outcome
brood survivorshipe1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
primary clutchese1

Verbatim

e0

“among E. postvittana, its host plants, and its resident enemies in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4487–4564 · show in text ↑
e1

“I found that secondary clutches were significantly larger than primary clutches in ovicide treatments and also experienced greater brood survivorship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2135 · show in text ↑