Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

DNA changes in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under salt stress as revealed by RAPD marker

Saleh, B.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was applied to evaluate DNA changes among four upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties [Niab 78 (N78), Deir-Ezzor 22 (DE22), Deltapine 50 (DP50) and Aleppo 118 (A118)] grown under non-saline conditions (control) and salt stress (200 mM NaCl) for seven weeks. Changes in RAPD profiles were measured as genomic template stability (GTS%). The highest estimated GTS% value was recorded for the two sensitive varieties, DP50 (79.1%) followed by A118 (58.2%); whereas, the lowest value was recorded for the two other tolerant varieties DE22 (36.7%) followed by N78 (26.4%). Based upon the data presented, RAPD marker could be used as potential tool for early identification of cotton tolerance to salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP50 had the highest estimated GTS value, 79.1%.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
DP50e0
Outcome
GTS% valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
79.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest estimated GTS% value was recorded for the two sensitive varieties, DP50 (79.1%) followed by A118 (58.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A118 had estimated GTS of 58.2%, below DP50.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
A118e0
Outcome
GTS%e0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
58.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest estimated GTS% value was recorded for the two sensitive varieties, DP50 (79.1%) followed by A118 (58.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DE22 had estimated GTS of 36.7%.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
DE22e0
Outcome
valuee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
36.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest value was recorded for the two other tolerant varieties DE22 (36.7%) followed by N78 (26.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N78 had estimated GTS of 26.4%, lowest in the ranked varieties.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
N78e0
Outcome
valuee0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
26.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest value was recorded for the two other tolerant varieties DE22 (36.7%) followed by N78 (26.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose RAPD markers for early identification of cotton salt tolerance.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
early identification of cotton tolerance to salt stresse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAPD marker could be used as potential tool for early identification of cotton tolerance to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑