Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the effect of inter and intra row spacing on the performance of pigeon pea under irrigated and intercropped situation. The treatments comprised of planting geometry (row spacing of 90, 120, 150 and 180 cm at varied level of plant to plant spacing with 30, 45, and 60 cm) and different row proportions of pigeonpea + greengram (1:2, 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5) were studied in randomized block design with three replications. The results of the study revealed that the gross return (Rs 61,951/ha), net return (Rs 37, 457/ha) and BCR (2.53) monetary advantage index (20607) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Gross return of pigeonpea increased significantly (Rs 61,951/ha) with wider 120 x 30 cm spacing and 1:3 pigeonpea:greengram row proportion.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportione1
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- Rs 61,951/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gross return (Rs 61,951/ha)”
e1“of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion”
Claim · model-written summary
Net return of pigeonpea increased significantly (Rs 37,457/ha) with wider 120 x 30 cm spacing and 1:3 row proportion.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportione1
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- Rs 37, 457/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return (Rs 37, 457/ha)”
e1“of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit-cost ratio of pigeonpea increased significantly (2.53) with wider 120 x 30 cm spacing and 1:3 row proportion.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportione1
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 2.53e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BCR (2.53)”
e1“of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion”
Claim · model-written summary
Monetary advantage index of pigeonpea increased significantly (20607) with wider 120 x 30 cm spacing and 1:3 row proportion.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportione1
- Outcome
- monetary advantage indexe0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 20607e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“monetary advantage index (20607)”
e1“of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion”
Claim · model-written summary
Income equivalent ratio of pigeonpea increased significantly (1.29) with wider 120 x 30 cm spacing and 1:3 row proportion.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportione1
- Outcome
- income equivalent ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 1.29e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“income equivalent ratio (1.29)”
e1“of pigeonpea increased significantly with wider spacing of 120 x 30 cm with 1:3 row proportion”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.