Paper · 2016 · ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH

The effect of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield, nutrient uptake and use efficiency of two maize (Zea mays L.) varieties under rain fed condition on Haplic Lixisol in the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana

Benedicta Y. Fosu-Mensah; Michael Mensah

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Low soil fertility is recognized as the major constraint to food production and food security in Ghana. An important practice that restores some level of fertility is long fallow, however this is no longer practiced due to increased pressure on land for other purposes. This has resulted in decline in crop yields in areas (forest-savannah transition zone or Sub-humid Ghana) which are known to be one of the major food baskets for the country. The soils are generally poor and require mineral fertilizer to increase crop productivity. In order to increase food production and crop productivity, the use of mineral fertilizer is required other than the expansion of arable land. The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of Phosphorus and Nitrogen fertilizers on the yield of two maize varieties and nutrient use efficiency in the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana. Experimental data from two maize varieties (Zea mays L.) grown under four concentrations of nitrogen (N) and three concentrations of phosphorus (P) in the 2008 major and minor seasons at two sites in Ejura, Ghana, were used to assess the influence of P and N on the yield, nutrient uptake and use efficiency in the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana. Analysis of variance showed a statistically significant effect of N and P on grain yield, total biomass, grain N uptake and apparent N recovery. Increasing N concentration significantly increased grain yield, grain N uptake and total dry matter production irrespective of application of P fertilizer. The application of P fertilizer increased N use efficiency with grain yield ranging from 918 (control) to 4953 kg ha−1 (N4P2) and 824 (control) to 4267 kg ha−1 (N4P2) for Obatanpa and Dorke maize, respectively. The two cultivars were significantly different from each other with higher grain yield produced by Obatanpa than Dorke. The application of inorganic P fertilizer increased the efficient utilization of inorganic N fertilizer by the plants in grain yield and total biomass production. Hence, P nutrition of soils is critical for the efficient use of inorganic N fertilizer in the area. Inorganic fertilizer use in the study area was agronomically efficient, though generally more efficient at the Ejura farm site (Experiment 1 and 3) than the Agricultural College site (Experiment 2 and 4). Owing to the spatial variability in soil nutrients in the study area, site-specific fertilizer testing is needed to increase nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. To improve the rate of fertilizer adoption and use by farmers, the government should subsidize the cost of fertilizer to make it affordable for farmers to purchase to increase crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N and P significantly affected maize grain yield and total biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N and Pe0
Outcome
grain yield, total biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Analysis of variance showed a statistically significant effect of N and P on grain yield, total biomass, grain N uptake and apparent N recovery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N and P significantly affected maize grain N uptake and apparent N recovery.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N and Pe0
Outcome
grain N uptake and apparent N recoverye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Analysis of variance showed a statistically significant effect of N and P on grain yield, total biomass, grain N uptake and apparent N recovery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N significantly increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Increasing N concentratione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
irrespective of application of P fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing N concentration significantly increased grain yield, grain N uptake and total dry matter production irrespective of application of P fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N significantly increased maize grain N uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Increasing N concentratione0
Outcome
grain N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing N concentration significantly increased grain yield, grain N uptake and total dry matter production irrespective of application of P fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N significantly increased maize total dry matter production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Increasing N concentratione0
Outcome
total dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing N concentration significantly increased grain yield, grain N uptake and total dry matter production irrespective of application of P fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased maize N use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
P fertilizere0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of P fertilizer increased N use efficiency with grain yield ranging from 918 (control) to 4953 kg ha−1 (N4P2) and 824 (control) to 4267 kg ha−1 (N4P2) for Obatanpa and Dorke maize, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Obatanpa maize yielded 4953 kg ha−1 under N4P2 versus 918 in control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Obatanpae0
Treatment
N4P2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4953 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
918 (control)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of P fertilizer increased N use efficiency with grain yield ranging from 918 (control) to 4953 kg ha−1 (N4P2) and 824 (control) to 4267 kg ha−1 (N4P2) for Obatanpa and Dorke maize, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorke maize yielded 4267 kg ha−1 under N4P2 versus 824 in control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Dorkee0
Treatment
N4P2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4267 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
824 (control)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of P fertilizer increased N use efficiency with grain yield ranging from 918 (control) to 4953 kg ha−1 (N4P2) and 824 (control) to 4267 kg ha−1 (N4P2) for Obatanpa and Dorke maize, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1748 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Obatanpa grain yield was significantly higher than Dorke grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Obatanpae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Dorkee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two cultivars were significantly different from each other with higher grain yield produced by Obatanpa than Dorke.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic P fertilizer increased maize utilization of inorganic N in grain yield and biomass production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic P fertilizere0
Outcome
efficient utilization of inorganic N fertilizere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
grain yield and total biomass productione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of inorganic P fertilizer increased the efficient utilization of inorganic N fertilizer by the plants in grain yield and total biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–2031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer was agronomically efficient, more so at Ejura farm than Agricultural College.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
agronomically efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
Agricultural College sitee0
Setting
Ejura farm sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inorganic fertilizer use in the study area was agronomically efficient, though generally more efficient at the Ejura farm site (Experiment 1 and 3) than the Agricultural College site (Experiment 2 and 4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2337 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended site-specific fertilizer testing to improve nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
site-specific fertilizer testinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Owing to the spatial variability in soil nutrients in the study area, site-specific fertilizer testing is needed to increase nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2509 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended government fertilizer subsidies to improve adoption and crop productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
government should subsidize the cost of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“To improve the rate of fertilizer adoption and use by farmers, the government should subsidize the cost of fertilizer to make it affordable for farmers to purchase to increase crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2510–2704 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.