Paper · 2015 · Journal of Oilseeds Research

Efficacy of newer insecticides against Spodoptera litura in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

M VENKATAIAH; B ANIL KUMAR; SREEDHAR CHAUHAN

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12 to evaluate the efficacy of five newer insecticides (chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide, spinosad, thiodicarb, novaluron) with two conventional insecticides (dichlorvos and chlorpyriphos) against tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura in groundnut. The experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with eight treatments and three replications. The results revealed that the maximum percentage of larval reduction and defoliation was in flubendiamide 480SC @ 150 ml/ha followed by chlorantraniliprole 20SC @ 125 ml/ha and novaluron 10EC @ 500 ml/ha. Highest dry pod yield of groundnut was recorded in flubendiamide (2650 and 2100 kg/ha) followed by chlorantraniliprole (2500 and 1983 kg/ha) and novaluron (2267 and 1958 kg/ha) as against 1750 and 1375 kg/ha in untreated control during 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively. The maximum cost-benefit ratio of 1: 2.5 and 1: 2.13 was obtained with flubendiamide during 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 480SC at 150 ml/ha gave the maximum larval reduction and defoliation of Spodoptera litura in groundnut, ahead of chlorantraniliprole and novaluron.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
flubendiamide 480SC @ 150 ml/hae2
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae1pest
Outcome
percentage of larval reduction and defoliatione2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“against tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–329 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the maximum percentage of larval reduction and defoliation was in flubendiamide 480SC @ 150 ml/ha followed by chlorantraniliprole 20SC @ 125 ml/ha and novaluron 10EC @ 500 ml/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide gave the highest dry pod yield of groundnut (2650 and 2100 kg/ha) against 1750 and 1375 kg/ha in the untreated control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
flubendiamidee3
Outcome
dry pod yielde3
Direction
Higheste3
Value
2650 and 2100 kg/hae3
Qualifier
1750 and 1375 kg/hae4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest dry pod yield of groundnut was recorded in flubendiamide (2650 and 2100 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–728 · show in text ↑
e4

“as against 1750 and 1375 kg/ha in untreated control during 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole gave the next highest dry pod yield of groundnut (2500 and 1983 kg/ha).

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
chlorantraniliprolee5
Outcome
dry pod yielde3
Direction
followed bye5
Value
2500 and 1983 kg/hae5
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest dry pod yield of groundnut was recorded in flubendiamide (2650 and 2100 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–728 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by chlorantraniliprole (2500 and 1983 kg/ha) and novaluron (2267 and 1958 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron gave the dry pod yield of groundnut at 2267 and 1958 kg/ha, following flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
novalurone5
Outcome
dry pod yielde3
Direction
followed bye5
Value
2267 and 1958 kg/hae5
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest dry pod yield of groundnut was recorded in flubendiamide (2650 and 2100 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–728 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by chlorantraniliprole (2500 and 1983 kg/ha) and novaluron (2267 and 1958 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide gave the maximum cost-benefit ratio (1: 2.5 and 1: 2.13) in the two seasons.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
flubendiamidee6
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe6
Direction
maximume6
Value
1: 2.5 and 1: 2.13e6
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during rabi/summer season of 2010-11 and 2011-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest dry pod yield of groundnut was recorded in flubendiamide (2650 and 2100 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–728 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum cost-benefit ratio of 1: 2.5 and 1: 2.13 was obtained with flubendiamide during 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1038 · show in text ↑

novaluron · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

flubendiamide · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.