Paper · 2016 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Evaluation of insecticide molecules with novel modes of action against leaf miner (Aproaerema modicella Deventer) in rainfed Groundnut

Zadda Kavitha; C. Vijayaraghavan

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted during rabi 2011 and 2012 to evaluate newer insecticide molecules against groundnut leaf miner in rainfed conditions. During the 2011 and 2012 field trials at 15 days after second spray, in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% sprayed plots 1.7 and 0.8% leaf miner infestation was observed respectively as against 18.2% in untreated control. Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% with 2.2 and 1.7% infestation was the next best treatment and it was closely followed by novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01%. Groundnut pod yield was significantly higher in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% (1500 kg/ha) followed by imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% (1376.67 kg/ha) and novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01% (1321.67 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad plots had 1.7% leaf miner infestation in 2011.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018%e0
Interactor
leaf minere1pest
Outcome
leaf miner infestatione0
Value
1.7e0
Qualifier
2011e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the 2011 and 2012 field trials at 15 days after second spray, in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% sprayed plots 1.7 and 0.8% leaf miner infestation was observed respectively as against 18.2% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut leaf miner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad plots had 0.8% leaf miner infestation in 2012.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018%e0
Interactor
leaf minere1pest
Outcome
leaf miner infestatione0
Value
0.8%e0
Qualifier
2012e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the 2011 and 2012 field trials at 15 days after second spray, in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% sprayed plots 1.7 and 0.8% leaf miner infestation was observed respectively as against 18.2% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut leaf miner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plots had 2.2% leaf miner infestation in 2011.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Treatment
Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e0
Interactor
leaf minere2pest
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
next beste0
Value
2.2e0
Qualifier
2011e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% with 2.2 and 1.7% infestation was the next best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“2011 and 2012 field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“groundnut leaf miner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plots had 1.7% leaf miner infestation in 2012.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Treatment
Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e0
Interactor
leaf minere2pest
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
next beste0
Value
1.7%e0
Qualifier
2012e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% with 2.2 and 1.7% infestation was the next best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“2011 and 2012 field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“groundnut leaf miner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron closely followed imidacloprid for infestation control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Treatment
novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01%e0
Interactor
leaf minere2pest
Outcome
infestatione1
Direction
closely followede0
Comparator
Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was closely followed by novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% with 2.2 and 1.7% infestation was the next best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“groundnut leaf miner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad yielded 1500 kg/ha, significantly higher than other treatments.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018%e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1500 kg/hae0
Comparator
imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut pod yield was significantly higher in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% (1500 kg/ha) followed by imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% (1376.67 kg/ha) and novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01% (1321.67 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid yielded 1376.67 kg/ha, below spinosad and above novaluron.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Value
1376.67 kg/hae0
Comparator
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut pod yield was significantly higher in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% (1500 kg/ha) followed by imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% (1376.67 kg/ha) and novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01% (1321.67 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron yielded 1321.67 kg/ha.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01%e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Value
1321.67 kg/hae0
Comparator
imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut pod yield was significantly higher in spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018% (1500 kg/ha) followed by imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.005% (1376.67 kg/ha) and novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01% (1321.67 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–689 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

spinosad · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

novaluron · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.