Abstract
Abstract Bradyrhizobia is often applied in the seed furrow when peanut is planted to ensure nodulation and subsequent biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). Several fungicides, insecticides, and fertilizer solutions are registered for in-furrow application in peanut while others or currently being evaluated for possible use. The effect of these products on efficacy of Bradyrhizobia inoculant has not been thoroughly investigated. Research was conducted in North Carolina and Virginia to determine peanut response to in-furrow application of Bradyrhizobia inoculant alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, and tebuconazole; the insecticide imidacloprid; and the commercial fertilizer Asset® RTU. Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole. In experiments from 2004–2007, pod yield was lower when inoculant was applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer in three of 11, six of 11, three of 8, and three of 11 experiments, respectively, when compared with inoculant alone. Imidacloprid did not affect peanut yield. Pod yield was not improved by any of the fungicide, insecticide, or fertilizer treatments when compared with inoculant alone. These experiments (2004–2007) were conducted in fields without previous peanut plantings or where rotations were long enough to minimize disease incidence. Although benefits of disease control were not defined in these experiments, these data suggest that adverse effects on inoculant can occur when co-applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus azoxystrobin versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- azoxystrobine0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- inoculante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus boscalid versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- boscalide0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- inoculante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus pyraclostrobin versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- pyraclostrobine0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- inoculante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- propiconazole plus trifloxystrobine0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- inoculante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus tebuconazole versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- tebuconazolee0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- inoculante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield was lower with inoculant plus azoxystrobin than inoculant alone in three of 11 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- azoxystrobine0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- three of 11e0
- Comparator
- inoculant alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“In experiments from 2004–2007, pod yield was lower when inoculant was applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer in three of 11, six of 11, three of 8, and three of 11 experiments, respectively, when compared with inoculant alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield was lower with inoculant plus pyraclostrobin than inoculant alone in six of 11 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- pyraclostrobine0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- six of 11e0
- Comparator
- inoculant alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“In experiments from 2004–2007, pod yield was lower when inoculant was applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer in three of 11, six of 11, three of 8, and three of 11 experiments, respectively, when compared with inoculant alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield was lower with inoculant plus tebuconazole than inoculant alone in three of 8 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- tebuconazolee0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- three of 8e0
- Comparator
- inoculant alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“In experiments from 2004–2007, pod yield was lower when inoculant was applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer in three of 11, six of 11, three of 8, and three of 11 experiments, respectively, when compared with inoculant alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield was lower with inoculant plus fertilizer than inoculant alone in three of 11 experiments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- fertilizere0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- three of 11e0
- Comparator
- inoculant alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
t1“Bradyrhizobia”
e0“In experiments from 2004–2007, pod yield was lower when inoculant was applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer in three of 11, six of 11, three of 8, and three of 11 experiments, respectively, when compared with inoculant alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid did not affect peanut yield.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- peanut yielde0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Imidacloprid did not affect peanut yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
No fungicide, insecticide, or fertilizer treatment improved pod yield relative to inoculant alone.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- fungicide, insecticide, or fertilizer treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Pod yielde0
- Direction
- not improvede0
- Comparator
- inoculant alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Pod yield was not improved by any of the fungicide, insecticide, or fertilizer treatments when compared with inoculant alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Coapplication with several products may adversely affect the inoculant.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- adverse effects on inoculante0
- Qualifier
- azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“these data suggest that adverse effects on inoculant can occur when co-applied with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, and fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →tebuconazole · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →trifloxystrobin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
boscalid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
propiconazole · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pyraclostrobin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →azoxystrobin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →insecticide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.