Paper · 2012 · Plant Health Progress

Interactive Effects of Fungicide, Application Timing, and Spray Volume on Peanut Diseases and Yield

Joao Augusto; Timothy B. Brenneman

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fungicide penetration of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea) canopy to target soilborne pathogens is difficult due to the dense foliage present when mid- to late-season applications are made. To assess the effect of application timing and volume on leaf spot and stem rot control as well as peanut yield, pyraclostrobin (0.21 kg a.i./ha) or chlorothalonil (1.26 kg a.i./ha), a systemic and a contact fungicide, respectively, were applied four times on cv. Georgia Green during the day (on unfolded leaves) or at night (on folded leaves) at 187, 243, or 355 liters/ha. Night application of pyraclostrobin, across spray volumes, gave the best stem rot control and pod yield increase. Pyraclostrobin applied during the day at higher spray volumes also slightly increased control of stem rot, apparently by improving canopy penetration. Neither application timing nor spray volume affected leaf spot control with pyraclostrobin. Higher spray volumes for the chlorothalonil applications tended to improve control of early and late leaf spot, possibly by increasing coverage of foliage and stems. Accepted for publication 10 January 2012. Published 20 April 2012.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night application of pyraclostrobin gave the best stem rot control across spray volumes.

Treatment
Night application of pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
stem rot controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Night application of pyraclostrobin, across spray volumes, gave the best stem rot control and pod yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night application of pyraclostrobin increased peanut pod yield across spray volumes.

Treatment
Night application of pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Night application of pyraclostrobin, across spray volumes, gave the best stem rot control and pod yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher daytime pyraclostrobin spray volumes slightly improved stem rot control.

Treatment
Pyraclostrobin applied during the day at higher spray volumese0
Outcome
control of stem rote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyraclostrobin applied during the day at higher spray volumes also slightly increased control of stem rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing did not affect leaf spot control with pyraclostrobin.

Treatment
application timinge0
Outcome
leaf spot controle0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither application timing nor spray volume affected leaf spot control with pyraclostrobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray volume did not affect leaf spot control with pyraclostrobin.

Treatment
spray volumee0
Outcome
leaf spot controle0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither application timing nor spray volume affected leaf spot control with pyraclostrobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher chlorothalonil spray volumes tended to improve early and late leaf spot control.

Treatment
Higher spray volumes for the chlorothalonil applicationse0
Outcome
control of early and late leaf spote0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher spray volumes for the chlorothalonil applications tended to improve control of early and late leaf spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pyraclostrobin · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

chlorothalonil · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.