Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus pyraclostrobin versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.

A claim from Peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) Response toBradyrhizobiaInoculant Applied In-furrow with Agrichemicals · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield did not differ with inoculant plus pyraclostrobin versus inoculant alone in three 2002 experiments.

Treatment
pyraclostrobine0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobiat1symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
inoculante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6
t1

“Bradyrhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52
e0

“Peanut yield did not differ in three experiments during 2002 when inoculant was applied alone or with the fungicides azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–969

Title

Peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) Response toBradyrhizobiaInoculant Applied In-furrow with Agrichemicals

David L. Jordan; P. Dewayne Johnson; Rick L. Brandenburg; et al. Peanut Science 2010. doi:10.3146/ps09-005.1

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-f801f34fb68ad81a4098775ab5ca171a1af0fa74fdeae775d2a69f60bb3e34aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pyraclostrobin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.