Abstract
ABSTRACT Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in North Carolina and injury from this insect can lower yield. Research was conducted from 2012 through 2014 in North Carolina to compare visible injury from tobacco thrips feeding and peanut yield when acephate, imidacloprid, and phorate were applied alone in the seed furrow at planting or followed by acephate applied postemergence 3 weeks after planting. In a second experiment conducted during the same time period, a commercial liquid formulation of Bradyrhizobia inoculant was applied alone or with imidacloprid in fields with and without plantings of peanut in recent years. Peanut injury from tobacco thrips feeding was reduced by acephate, imidacloprid, and phorate applied in the seed furrow at planting compared with non-treated peanut. Acephate applied 3 weeks after planting generally reduced injury from thrips. Pod yield was greater when imidacloprid was applied compared with yield for the non-treated control or when acephate was applied in the seed furrow. Pod yield was similar regardless of in-furrow treatment when acephate was applied postemergence. Thrips control by imidacloprid was not affected by Bradyrhizobia inoculant, and imidacloprid did not negatively affect efficacy of Bradyrhizobia inoculant regardless of previous field history. These data indicate that imidacloprid protects peanut as well as or more effectively than the systemic insecticides acephate and phorate and that imidacloprid is compatible with Bradyrhizobia inoculant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
In-furrow acephate, imidacloprid and phorate at planting reduced tobacco thrips injury in peanut compared with non-treated peanut.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- acephate, imidacloprid, and phorate applied in the seed furrow at plantinge1
- Interactor
- Tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- Peanut injury from tobacco thrips feedinge1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- non-treated peanute1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e1“Peanut injury from tobacco thrips feeding was reduced by acephate, imidacloprid, and phorate applied in the seed furrow at planting compared with non-treated peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate applied 3 weeks after planting generally reduced thrips injury in peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Acephate applied 3 weeks after plantinge2
- Outcome
- injury from thripse2
- Direction
- reducede2
ThripsNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e2“Acephate applied 3 weeks after planting generally reduced injury from thrips”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield in peanut was greater with imidacloprid than with the non-treated control.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride3
- Outcome
- Pod yielde3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Comparator
- non-treated controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e3“Pod yield was greater when imidacloprid was applied compared with yield for the non-treated control or when acephate was applied in the seed furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield in peanut was greater with imidacloprid than with acephate applied in the seed furrow.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride3
- Outcome
- Pod yielde3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Comparator
- acephate was applied in the seed furrowe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e3“Pod yield was greater when imidacloprid was applied compared with yield for the non-treated control or when acephate was applied in the seed furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield in peanut was similar regardless of in-furrow treatment when acephate was applied postemergence.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- acephate was applied postemergencee4
- Outcome
- Pod yielde4
- Direction
- similare4
- Comparator
- in-furrow treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e4“Pod yield was similar regardless of in-furrow treatment when acephate was applied postemergence”
Claim · model-written summary
Thrips control by imidacloprid in peanut was not affected by Bradyrhizobia inoculant.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Bradyrhizobia inoculante5
- Second interactor
- Bradyrhizobiae5symbiont
- Outcome
- Thrips control by imidaclopride5
- Direction
- not affectede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e5“Thrips control by imidacloprid was not affected by Bradyrhizobia inoculant”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid did not negatively affect the efficacy of Bradyrhizobia inoculant in peanut, regardless of previous field history.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride6
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobiae6symbiont
- Outcome
- efficacy of Bradyrhizobia inoculante6
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte6
- Qualifier
- regardless of previous field historye6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) is an important pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e6“imidacloprid did not negatively affect efficacy of Bradyrhizobia inoculant regardless of previous field history”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid protects peanut as well as or more effectively than the systemic insecticides acephate and phorate.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae7
- Treatment
- imidaclopride7
- Outcome
- protects peanute7
- Direction
- as well as or more effectivelye7
- Comparator
- systemic insecticides acephate and phoratee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“imidacloprid protects peanut as well as or more effectively than the systemic insecticides acephate and phorate”
The same questions in other papers
acephate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →imidacloprid · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
imidacloprid · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
phorate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →acephate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →acephate · Thrips · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.