Paper · 2021 · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management

Effect of thiamethoxam seed treatment in peanut

Scott Monfort; Albert Culbreath; Mark Abney; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tobacco thrips ( Frankliniella fusca ) and tomato spotted wilt (TSW) orthotospovirus (family Tospoviridae, genus Orthotospovirus) can reduce peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) yield. Systemic insecticides are applied in the seed furrow at planting and to peanut foliage to reduce injury from tobacco thrips and decrease incidence of TSW. Research was conducted in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia in 2013 and 2014 to compare the effect of the following treatments on tobacco thrips feeding injury and expression of TSW in peanut: thiamethoxam seed treatment, thiamethoxam seed treatment followed by acephate 3 weeks after planting, phorate applied in the seed furrow at planting, and a nontreated check. Tobacco thrips feeding injury and TSW incidence were significantly higher in thiamethoxam and thiamethoxam followed by acephate‐treated peanut than peanut treated with phorate. Thiamethoxan seed treatment followed by acephate resulted in significantly lower tobacco thrips feeding injury compared to thiamethoxam seed treatment alone. Yield of Virginia market type cultivars was greater when thiamethoxam was followed by acephate applied to peanut foliage or when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alone. Runner market type cultivars yielded higher when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut while peanut treated with thiamethoxam with or with acephate yielded similar to both of these treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco thrips feeding injury was significantly higher with thiamethoxam seed treatment than with phorate in peanut.

Treatment
thiamethoxame2
Interactor
tobacco thripse2pest
Outcome
Tobacco thrips feeding injurye2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
phoratee2
Setting
Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Research was conducted in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia in 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–438 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tobacco thrips feeding injury and TSW incidence were significantly higher in thiamethoxam and thiamethoxam followed by acephate‐treated peanut than peanut treated with phorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TSW incidence was significantly higher with thiamethoxam seed treatment than with phorate in peanut.

Treatment
thiamethoxame2
Interactor
tomato spotted wilt (TSW) orthotospovirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee3pathogen
Outcome
TSW incidencee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
phoratee2
Setting
Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Research was conducted in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia in 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–438 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tobacco thrips feeding injury and TSW incidence were significantly higher in thiamethoxam and thiamethoxam followed by acephate‐treated peanut than peanut treated with phorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–904 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato spotted wilt (TSW) orthotospovirus (family Tospoviridae, genus Orthotospovirus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment followed by acephate significantly reduced tobacco thrips feeding injury compared with thiamethoxam seed treatment alone.

Treatment
Thiamethoxan seed treatment followed by acephatee2
Interactor
tobacco thripse2pest
Outcome
tobacco thrips feeding injurye2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
thiamethoxam seed treatment alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tobacco thrips feeding injury and TSW incidence were significantly higher in thiamethoxam and thiamethoxam followed by acephate‐treated peanut than peanut treated with phorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–904 · show in text ↑
e2

“Thiamethoxan seed treatment followed by acephate resulted in significantly lower tobacco thrips feeding injury compared to thiamethoxam seed treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virginia market type cultivar yield was greater with thiamethoxam followed by acephate than with nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alone.

Material
Virginia market type cultivarse1
Treatment
thiamethoxam was followed by acephate applied to peanut foliagee1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield of Virginia market type cultivars was greater when thiamethoxam was followed by acephate applied to peanut foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1184 · show in text ↑
e2

“or when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virginia market type cultivar yield was greater with phorate than with nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alone.

Material
Virginia market type cultivarse1
Treatment
phoratee2
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield of Virginia market type cultivars was greater when thiamethoxam was followed by acephate applied to peanut foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1184 · show in text ↑
e2

“or when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut or the seed treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runner market type cultivar yield was higher with phorate than with nontreated peanut.

Material
Runner market type cultivarse1
Treatment
phoratee1
Outcome
yieldede1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
nontreated peanute1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Runner market type cultivars yielded higher when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runner market type cultivar yield with thiamethoxam with or without acephate was similar to both phorate and nontreated peanut.

Material
Runner market type cultivarse1
Treatment
thiamethoxam with or with acephatee2
Outcome
yieldede2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
both of these treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Runner market type cultivars yielded higher when phorate was applied compared with nontreated peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1374 · show in text ↑
e2

“while peanut treated with thiamethoxam with or with acephate yielded similar to both of these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1479 · show in text ↑

acephate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phorate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acephate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.