Abstract
Abstract Tobacco thrips ( Frankliniella fusca Hinds) can reduce peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) yield if not controlled in many instances in North Carolina and Virginia. Systemic insecticides are often applied in the seed furrow at planting to suppress tobacco thrips and protect peanut yield. Foliar sprays of acephate [ N ‐(methoxy[methylsulfanyl]phosphoryl)acetamide] are often made regardless of the insecticide applied at planting. Imidacloprid [( NE )‐ N ‐[1‐([6‐chloropyridin‐3‐yl]methyl)imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)nitramide] plus fluopyram [ N ‐(2‐[3‐chloro‐5‐(trifluoromethyl)pyridin‐2‐yl]ethyl)‐2‐(trifluoromethyl)benzamide])] is registered for use in peanut but information in the peer‐reviewed literature is limited regarding its effectiveness in suppressing tobacco thrips and whether or not a foliar application of acephate is needed when this product is used. Peanut injury caused by tobacco thrips was lower when phorate [diethoxy‐(ethylsulfanylmethylsulfanyl)‐sulfanylidene‐λ5‐phosphane] or imidacloprid were applied alone compared with imidacloprid plus fluopyram in 16 trials conducted in North Carolina and Virginia from 2014 to 2020. However, all insecticides applied at planting protected peanut from injury caused by tobacco thrips well enough to prevent yield loss compared with nontreated peanut. Although acephate decreased visible injury caused by tobacco thrips, yield was not affected by acephate regardless of the systemic insecticide applied at planting. The results from these trials indicate that imidacloprid plus fluopyram offers adequate suppression of tobacco thrips to protect yield. Although acephate suppressed tobacco thrips, yield was not affected by acephate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Phorate alone yielded lower thrips injury than imidacloprid plus fluopyram.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- phoratee0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- Peanut injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- imidacloprid plus fluopyrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut injury caused by tobacco thrips was lower when phorate [diethoxy‐(ethylsulfanylmethylsulfanyl)‐sulfanylidene‐λ5‐phosphane] or imidacloprid were applied alone compared with imidacloprid plus fluopyram”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid alone yielded lower thrips injury than imidacloprid plus fluopyram.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- Peanut injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- imidacloprid plus fluopyrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut injury caused by tobacco thrips was lower when phorate [diethoxy‐(ethylsulfanylmethylsulfanyl)‐sulfanylidene‐λ5‐phosphane] or imidacloprid were applied alone compared with imidacloprid plus fluopyram”
Claim · model-written summary
All planting insecticides protected peanut against thrips injury sufficiently to prevent yield loss versus untreated peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- all insecticides applied at plantinge0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- yield losse0
- Direction
- prevente0
- Comparator
- nontreated peanute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all insecticides applied at planting protected peanut from injury caused by tobacco thrips well enough to prevent yield loss compared with nontreated peanut.”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate reduced visible injury caused by tobacco thrips.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- acephatee0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- visible injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“acephate decreased visible injury caused by tobacco thrips”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate did not affect yield regardless of systemic insecticide at planting.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- acephatee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield was not affected by acephate regardless of the systemic insecticide applied at planting.”
t0“peanut”
The same questions in other papers
acephate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →imidacloprid · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
phorate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →acephate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →insecticide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.