Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips although in some instances applying both insecticides was more effective than a single insecticide.

A claim from Influence of Planting Date and Insecticide on Injury Caused by Tobacco Thrips and Peanut Yield in North Carolina · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips although in some instances applying both insecticides was more effective than a single insecticide.

Treatment
phoratee0
Interactor
tobacco thripse0pest
Outcome
injury caused by tobacco thripse0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
the combination of both insecticidese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips although in some instances applying both insecticides was more effective than a single insecticide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–807
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88

Title

Influence of Planting Date and Insecticide on Injury Caused by Tobacco Thrips and Peanut Yield in North Carolina

D.J. Mahoney; D.L. Jordan; R.L. Brandenburg; et al. Peanut Science 2018. doi:10.3146/0095-3679-45.2.70

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-9b2fce437bb22952710486a6327cf6ea1a072849ab70115b356834d88d357d81 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

phorate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.