Abstract
Planting date can affect pest incidence and severity in peanut. Research was conducted from 2013 to 2016 in North Carolina to determine tobacco thrips Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) injury and pod yield when peanut was planted in early, mid-, and late-May when phorate was applied in the seed furrow at planting, acephate was applied to emerged peanut 3 wk after planting, or when both insecticides were applied. Differences in visible injury to peanut caused by tobacco thrips feeding were observed across yr, planting dates, and insecticide treatments. Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips although in some instances applying both insecticides was more effective than a single insecticide. Visible injury caused by tobacco thrips was often greater when peanut was planted in early May compared with later plantings. Peanut yield was protected equally from tobacco thrips injury by phorate, acephate, and the combination of both insecticides. Planting date and insecticides affected peanut yield independently suggesting that strategies for managing tobacco thrips will not differ across planting dates in North Carolina. Peanut yield was greater in 2 of 4 yr when planted in mid-May compared with planting in early or late-May.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Visible peanut injury from tobacco thrips differed across years, planting dates, and insecticide treatments.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- visible injury to peanut caused by tobacco thrips feedinge0
- Qualifier
- across yr, planting dates, and insecticide treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in visible injury to peanut caused by tobacco thrips feeding were observed across yr, planting dates, and insecticide treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phorate was often as effective as the combined insecticides at preventing thrips injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- phoratee0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- as effective ase0
- Comparator
- combination of both insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate was often as effective as the combined insecticides at preventing thrips injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- acephatee0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- as effective ase0
- Comparator
- combination of both insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying either phorate or acephate was often as effective as the combination of both insecticides in preventing injury caused by tobacco thrips”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined insecticides were more effective than a single insecticide in some instances.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- both insecticidese0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Qualifier
- in some instancese0
- Comparator
- a single insecticidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in some instances applying both insecticides was more effective than a single insecticide”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Early May planting often had greater visible thrips injury than later plantings.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- planted in early Maye0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- Visible injury caused by tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- later plantingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Visible injury caused by tobacco thrips was often greater when peanut was planted in early May compared with later plantings.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phorate protected peanut yield from thrips injury equally to the other insecticide options.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- phoratee0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- Peanut yielde0
- Direction
- equallye0
- Comparator
- acephatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut yield was protected equally from tobacco thrips injury by phorate, acephate, and the combination of both insecticides.”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date and insecticides independently affected peanut yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Outcome
- peanut yielde0
- Qualifier
- independentlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Planting date and insecticides affected peanut yield independently”
Claim · model-written summary
Mid-May planting produced greater peanut yield in two of four years than early or late May planting.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- planted in mid-Maye0
- Outcome
- Peanut yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- 2 of 4 yre0
- Comparator
- planting in early or late-Maye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut yield was greater in 2 of 4 yr when planted in mid-May compared with planting in early or late-May.”
The same questions in other papers
phorate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →phorate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →acephate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →sowing time · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.