Paper · 2016 · Plant Soil and Environment

Effects of Sb16 bacterial strain and herbicides on endophytic bacterial populations and growth of aerobic rice

A. Nahi; R. Othman; D. Omar

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Pot experiment was conducted under glasshouse conditions to investigate the effects of the inoculation of N2 fixing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain Sb16 and application of three herbicides (paraquat, pretilachlor and 2,4-D) at 0, 1/2X, X and 2X their recommended field application rates (X) on endophytic bacterial populations and physio-morphological parameters of aerobic rice. The physio-morphological traits such as plant height, leaf area, chlorophyll content, nitrogen (N) content, root dry mass, root length, root volume and root average diameter were assessed at 60th day after the treatment. Data on endophytic bacterial counts were collected at 15, 30, 45 and 60 days after the treatment. Results obtained from the study revealed that the number of endophytic bacteria and physio-morphological characters of aerobic rice significantly decreased with increasing herbicides dose. Sb16 inoculation significantly (P ≤ 0.0001) increased all the parameters measured. N contents were the highest (2.53 %) in the inoculated samples treated with half dose of 2, 4-D; but the lowest contents (1.89 %) were obtained in the non-inoculated samples treated with double dose of paraquat. The results suggest that Sb16 strain can improve productivity of aerobic rice under herbicide-stressed soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing herbicide dose decreased the number of endophytic bacteria in aerobic rice.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae2symbiont
Outcome
number of endophytic bacteriae2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
with increasing herbicides dosee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“physio-morphological parameters of aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of three herbicides (paraquat, pretilachlor and 2,4-D)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of endophytic bacteria and physio-morphological characters of aerobic rice significantly decreased with increasing herbicides dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sb16 inoculation significantly increased all measured parameters of aerobic rice.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Treatment
Sb16 inoculatione4
Interactor
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain Sb16Stenotrophomonas maltophiliae3symbiont
Outcome
parameters measurede4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
P ≤ 0.0001e4
Comparator
non-inoculated samplese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · InteractorRiraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physio-morphological parameters of aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–382 · show in text ↑
e3

“investigate the effects of the inoculation of N2 fixing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain Sb16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sb16 inoculation significantly (P ≤ 0.0001) increased all the parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–973 · show in text ↑
e6

“the lowest contents (1.89 %) were obtained in the non-inoculated samples treated with double dose of paraquat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content of aerobic rice was highest (2.53 %) in inoculated samples treated with half dose of 2,4-D.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Treatment
inoculated samples treated with half dose of 2, 4-De5
Outcome
N contentse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
2.53 %e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“physio-morphological parameters of aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–382 · show in text ↑
e5

“N contents were the highest (2.53 %) in the inoculated samples treated with half dose of 2, 4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content of aerobic rice was lowest (1.89 %) in non-inoculated samples treated with double dose of paraquat.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Treatment
non-inoculated samples treated with double dose of paraquate6
Outcome
N contentse5
Direction
loweste6
Value
1.89 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“physio-morphological parameters of aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–382 · show in text ↑
e5

“N contents were the highest (2.53 %) in the inoculated samples treated with half dose of 2, 4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1070 · show in text ↑
e6

“the lowest contents (1.89 %) were obtained in the non-inoculated samples treated with double dose of paraquat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1185 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

167 papers: 160 positive, 7 negative or no effect

159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

163 papers more in this group

See all 167 papers →

inoculation · Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.