Paper · 1997 · HortScience

Inheritance of Low-temperature-induced Cold Acclimation Response in Blueberry

Rajeev Arora; Lisa J. Rowland; Ganesh R. Panta; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mode of inheritance of cold hardiness (CH) in woody perennials is not wellunderstood. This study was undertaken to determine the mode of inheritance and gene action of CH in blueberry ( Vaccinium section Cyanococcus ). Two testcross populations (segregating for CH) derived from interspecific hybrids of V. darrowi (drw) × V. caesariense (csr) were used. Plants were cold-acclimated by a 4-week exposure to 4°C. Bud CH (LT 50 ) was defined as the temperature causing 50% injury (visual) when subjected to controlled freeze–thaw. Results show that the drw and csr parents had an LT50 of –13° and –20°C, respectively. The F 1 population exhibited mean LT 50 of –14.7°C. The csr and drw testcross populations had a mean LT 50 of –18° (39 individuals) and –14°C (33 individuals), respectively. Individuals of each population were distributed between parental values with center of distribution skewed toward the testcross parent. Since individuals having LT 50 s as same as the recurrent parents were present in each population of only 33–39 plants, data suggest that CH is determined by relatively few genes. To determine gene action, the estimates for various genetic parameters (calculated from joint scaling test) were used in generation means analysis to test various models. Results indicate that CH in blueberry can be best explained by simple-additive dominance model, whereas models including epistatic components did not satisfactorily explain the data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The V. darrowi parent had a bud LT50 of –13°.

Taxon
V. darrowie1
Outcome
LT50e0
Value
–13°e0

Verbatim

e0

“the drw and csr parents had an LT50 of –13° and –20°C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–614 · show in text ↑
e1

“V. darrowi (drw) × V. caesariense (csr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The V. caesariense parent had a bud LT50 of –20°C.

Taxon
V. caesarienseVaccinium caesariensee1
Outcome
LT50e0
Value
–20°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium caesariense
Vaccinium caesariense · TaxonMwanner at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the drw and csr parents had an LT50 of –13° and –20°C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–614 · show in text ↑
e1

“V. darrowi (drw) × V. caesariense (csr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F1 population had a mean LT50 of –14.7°C.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Material
F 1 populatione0
Outcome
LT 50e0
Value
–14.7°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The F 1 population exhibited mean LT 50 of –14.7°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The csr testcross population had a mean LT50 of –18°.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Material
csre0
Outcome
LT 50e0
Value
–18°e0

Verbatim

e0

“The csr and drw testcross populations had a mean LT 50 of –18° (39 individuals) and –14°C (33 individuals), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drw testcross population had a mean LT50 of –14°C.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Material
drwe0
Outcome
LT 50e0
Value
–14°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The csr and drw testcross populations had a mean LT 50 of –18° (39 individuals) and –14°C (33 individuals), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold hardiness in blueberry appears to be controlled by relatively few genes.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Gene
relatively few genese0
Outcome
CHe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“data suggest that CH is determined by relatively few genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A simple-additive dominance model best explained blueberry cold hardiness; models with epistasis did not satisfactorily explain it.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Outcome
CHe0
Comparator
models including epistatic componentse0

Verbatim

e0

“CH in blueberry can be best explained by simple-additive dominance model, whereas models including epistatic components did not satisfactorily explain the data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1459 · show in text ↑