Paper · 2016 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: can they promote plant growth?

Lara R. Jaber; Jürg Enkerli

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
220
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two experimental replicates were conducted to test whether strains of Beauveria brongniartii (BIPESCO2 and 2843) and Metarhizium brunneum (BIPESCO5) can endophytically colonise Vicia faba plants and improve their growth by comparing them with an endophytic strain of B. bassiana (NATURALIS®). The plants were inoculated through foliar spray and the effect of inoculation on plant height, leaf pair number, fresh root and shoot weights was measured at 7 and 14 days post inoculation (dpi). Endophytic colonisation of different plant parts with the tested fungal strains were confirmed 7 and 14 dpi through re-isolation of inoculated fungi onto selective media and subsequent Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) marker-based genetic identification. All tested strains were able to endophytically colonise leaves, stems, and even roots of inoculated plants 7 and 14 dpi, but per cent colonisation varied significantly among strains and plant parts within each sampling date. Foliar inoculation of plants with the tested strains increased plant height, leaf pair number, fresh shoot and root weights; however the increase was not always consistent across sampling dates in both experimental replicates. This study provides the first evidence for the endophytic colonisation of plants with two strains of B. brongniartii, an important biocontrol agent of Melolontha melolontha and other scarab beetles in several European countries, and thus extends previous reports on the ability of entomopathogenic fungi to act as endophytes. It also presents possible explanations for the lack of consistency in the plant growth promotion obtained by the foliar inoculation of entomopathogenic fungi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested fungal strains colonized leaves, stems and roots at 7 and 14 days.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
leaves, stems, and even rootse0
Outcome
endophytically colonise leaves, stems, and even rootse0
Qualifier
7 and 14 dpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested strains were able to endophytically colonise leaves, stems, and even roots of inoculated plants 7 and 14 dpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Beauveria brongniartii (BIPESCO2 and 2843) and Metarhizium brunneum (BIPESCO5) can endophytically colonise Vicia faba plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–194 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization percentages differed significantly by strain and plant part within sampling date.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Outcome
per cent colonisatione0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
among strains and plant parts within each sampling datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“per cent colonisation varied significantly among strains and plant parts within each sampling date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar inoculation increased plant height and leaf pair number inconsistently across sampling dates.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
Foliar inoculation of plants with the tested strainse0
Outcome
plant height, leaf pair numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
not always consistent across sampling dates in both experimental replicatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar inoculation of plants with the tested strains increased plant height, leaf pair number, fresh shoot and root weights; however the increase was not always consistent across sampling dates in both experimental replicates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar inoculation increased fresh shoot and root weights inconsistently across sampling dates.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
Foliar inoculation of plants with the tested strainse0
Outcome
fresh shoot and root weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
not always consistent across sampling dates in both experimental replicatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar inoculation of plants with the tested strains increased plant height, leaf pair number, fresh shoot and root weights; however the increase was not always consistent across sampling dates in both experimental replicates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–194 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 58 positive, 8 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.