Paper · 2014 · HortTechnology

Red and Far-red Light Treatments to Modify Thermoinhibition, Photoblasticity, and Longevity in Lettuce Seeds

Isabel Pimentel; Samuel Contreras

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Germination in lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) seeds can be inhibited by high temperatures (thermoinhibition) or darkness (positive photoblasticity). Priming is commonly used as a seed treatment to avoid these problems. However, this treatment is complicated, expensive and has detrimental effect on seed longevity. The objectives of this study were to 1) develop a simple alternative treatment to priming, based on red light irradiations and 2) to develop a treatment to extend seed longevity. Lettuce seeds from cultivars Tango, Milanesa, Ideal Cos, and Gallega de Invierno were partially hydrated in containers with 98% relative humidity (RH) and irradiated with red (R) light for 24 hours, or far-red (FR) light for 216 hours. Throughout the treatment, seeds reached 16% water content and, once finished, they were dried with air at 30 °C. Untreated (control) and primed seeds were also evaluated. Germination was evaluated in light and darkness at temperatures between 12 and 36 °C in a thermogradient table. Effects in longevity were estimated by evaluating germination after various aging periods at 45 °C and 75% RH. The R-light treatment improved germination in the dark at temperatures up to 25 °C, but did not have a significant effect on seed germination under light. Germination after accelerated aging showed that R- and FR- light treatments extended seed longevity when compared with control seeds. Therefore, this effect would not be associated to photoblasticity alleviation or imposition. Primed seeds deteriorated faster than the control. Compared with priming, the R-light treatment was simpler and improved seed longevity. However, priming effects on alleviation of seed photoblasticity and thermoinhibition at temperatures over 25 °C were greater.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-light treatment improved lettuce seed germination in the dark at temperatures up to 25 °C.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
R-light treatmente0
Outcome
germination in the darke0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at temperatures up to 25 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The R-light treatment improved germination in the dark at temperatures up to 25 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-light treatment did not have a significant effect on lettuce seed germination under light.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
R-light treatmente0
Outcome
seed germination under lighte0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The R-light treatment improved germination in the dark at temperatures up to 25 °C, but did not have a significant effect on seed germination under light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After accelerated aging, red-light treatment extended lettuce seed longevity compared with control seeds.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
R- and FR- light treatmentse0
Outcome
seed longevitye0
Direction
extendede0
Comparator
control seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination after accelerated aging showed that R- and FR- light treatments extended seed longevity when compared with control seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After accelerated aging, far-red-light treatment extended lettuce seed longevity compared with control seeds.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
FR- light treatmentse0
Outcome
seed longevitye0
Direction
extendede0
Comparator
control seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination after accelerated aging showed that R- and FR- light treatments extended seed longevity when compared with control seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed lettuce seeds deteriorated faster than the control.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Primed seedse0
Outcome
deterioratede0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Primed seeds deteriorated faster than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with priming, red-light treatment was simpler and improved lettuce seed longevity.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
R-light treatmente0
Outcome
seed longevitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
priminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with priming, the R-light treatment was simpler and improved seed longevity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming effects on alleviation of seed photoblasticity and thermoinhibition at temperatures over 25 °C were greater than those of the red-light treatment.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
alleviation of seed photoblasticity and thermoinhibitione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at temperatures over 25 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“priming effects on alleviation of seed photoblasticity and thermoinhibition at temperatures over 25 °C were greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1763 · show in text ↑

light · pest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Dynamic lighting reduced electricity consumption by 20% compared with on–off lighting.

    Dynamic control of supplemental lighting intensity in a greenhouse environment · 2012 · compared with a similar lighting system operated under a discontinuous on–off regime

    Same direction

  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.