Paper · 2016 · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology

Efficient regeneration and genetic transformation platform applicable to five Musa varieties

Juhua Liu; Pengzhao Gao; Xiuxiu Sun; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Background Banana ( Musa spp.) is an important staple food , economic crop, and nutritional fruit worldwide. Conventional breeding has been seriously hampered by their long generation time, polyploidy , and sterility of most cultivated varieties. Establishment of an efficient regeneration and transformation system for banana is critical to its genetic improvement and functional genomics . Results In this study, a vigorous and repeatable transformation system for banana using direct organogenesis was developed. The greatest number of shoots per explant for all five Musa varieties was obtained using Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 8.9 μM benzylaminopurine and 9.1 μM thidiazuron . One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively. Longitudinal sections of buds were transformed through particle bombardment combined with Agrobacterium -mediated transformation using a promoterless β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene; the highest transformation efficiency was 9.81% in regenerated Gongjiao plantlets in an optimized selection medium. Transgenic plants were confirmed by a histochemical assay of GUS, polymerase chain reaction , and Southern blot. Conclusions Our robust transformation platform successfully generated hundreds of transgenic plants. Such a platform will facilitate molecular breeding and functional genomics of banana.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified medium gave the greatest shoots per explant in all five varieties.

Taxon
Bananae1
Treatment
Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 8.9 μM benzylaminopurine and 9.1 μM thidiazurone0
Outcome
number of shoots per explante0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest number of shoots per explant for all five Musa varieties was obtained using Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 8.9 μM benzylaminopurine and 9.1 μM thidiazuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Gongjiao immature male flower regenerated 380–456 shoots in 240–270 days.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Gongjiaoe0
Organ / stage
immature male flowere0
Outcome
well-developed shootse0
Value
380–456e0
Qualifier
240–270 de0

Verbatim

e0

“One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Red banana immature male flower regenerated 310–372 shoots in 240–270 days.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Red bananae0
Organ / stage
immature male flowere0
Outcome
well-developed shootse0
Value
310–372e0
Qualifier
240–270 de0

Verbatim

e0

“One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Rose banana immature male flower regenerated 200–240 shoots in 240–270 days.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Rose bananae0
Organ / stage
immature male flowere0
Outcome
well-developed shootse0
Value
200–240e0
Qualifier
240–270 de0

Verbatim

e0

“One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Baxi immature male flower regenerated 130–156 shoots in 240–270 days.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Baxie0
Organ / stage
immature male flowere0
Outcome
well-developed shootse0
Value
130–156e0
Qualifier
240–270 de0

Verbatim

e0

“One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Xinglongnaijiao immature male flower regenerated 100–130 shoots in 240–270 days.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Xinglongnaijiaoe0
Organ / stage
immature male flowere0
Outcome
well-developed shootse0
Value
100–130e0
Qualifier
240–270 de0

Verbatim

e0

“One immature male flower could regenerate 380–456, 310–372, 200–240, 130–156, and 100–130 well-developed shoots in only 240–270 d for Gongjiao, Red banana, Rose banana, Baxi, and Xinglongnaijiao, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized transformation reached 9.81% efficiency in Gongjiao plantlets.

Taxon
Bananae1
Material
Gongjiaoe0
Outcome
transformation efficiencye0
Value
9.81%e0
Setting
optimized selection mediume0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest transformation efficiency was 9.81% in regenerated Gongjiao plantlets in an optimized selection medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Histochemical, PCR and Southern assays confirmed transgenic banana plants.

Taxon
Bananae1
Outcome
Transgenic plants were confirmede0
Value
hundredse2

Verbatim

e0

“Transgenic plants were confirmed by a histochemical assay of GUS, polymerase chain reaction , and Southern blot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banana ( Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“hundreds of transgenic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1425 · show in text ↑

Thidiazuron · growth · MusaResults differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

in vitro · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

68 papers: 58 positive, 10 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.