Abstract
The effects of agronomic practices were evaluated on mungbean production, using a randomized complete block design conducted at the Farming Research Development Center, Phaniat sub-district, Khok Sumrong district, Lop Buri province, Thailand during February to July 2015. Five agronomic practices (each with four replications) were tested—Thai farmer practice (TFP) as the control; Thailand recommendation (TR); Sri Lankan farmer practice (SLFP); Sri Lankan new recommendation (SLNR); and Thailand recommendation with paddy straw mulch (TRM)—each practice was composed of different tillage methods, seeding rates, mulching and seed inoculation (with Rhizobium). At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively. Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP. TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control. Overall, the results showed that the method of tillage, mulching and inoculum collectively determined the growth and seed yield of mungbean in a rice-mungbean cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
TRM increased mature plant height by 78.8% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- TRMe0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 78.8%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
- Setting
- maturity stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLNR increased mature plant height by 56.6% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLNRe0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 56.6%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
- Setting
- maturity stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLFP increased mature plant height by 31.5% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLFPe0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 31.5%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
- Setting
- maturity stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TR increased mature plant height by 20.8% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TRe0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 20.8%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
- Setting
- maturity stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TR increased leaves per plant at maturity by 20.9% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TRe0
- Outcome
- leaves per plant at maturitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 20.9%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLFP increased leaves per plant at maturity by 27.4% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLFPe0
- Outcome
- leaves per plant at maturitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27.4%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLNR increased leaves per plant at maturity by 33.1% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLNRe0
- Outcome
- leaves per plant at maturitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 33.1%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TRM increased leaves per plant at maturity by 60.1% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TRMe0
- Outcome
- leaves per plant at maturitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 60.1%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TRM increased mungbean yield by 109.13% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TRMe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 109.13%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TR increased mungbean yield by 41.4% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 41.4%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLFP increased mungbean yield by 46.1% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLFPe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 46.1%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
SLNR increased mungbean yield by 86.8% relative to TFP.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- SLNRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 86.8%e0
- Comparator
- TFPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TFP had the lowest plant height of 38.04 cm at maturity.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the maturity stage, the lowest height (38.04 cm) was found in TFP compared to 78.8%, 56.6%, 31.5% and 20.8% height increases reported in TRM, SLNR, SLFP, and TR, respectively.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity, 8.73.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- TFPe0
- Outcome
- leaves per plant at maturitye0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 8.73e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, TFP had the lowest leaves per plant at maturity (8.73), whereas the percentage of leaves per plant at maturity in TR, SLFP, SLNR and TRM was 20.9%, 27.4%, 33.1% and 60.1%, respectively, higher than in TFP.”
t0“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
TFP had the lowest yield at 0.657 t/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TFP produced the lowest yield (0.657 t/ha) while TRM, TR, SLFP and SLNR which produced increased yields by 109.13%, 41.4%, 46.1% and 86.8%, respectively, compared to the control.”
t0“mungbean”
The same questions in other papers
organic · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →irrigation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.