Paper · 2016 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Including white clover in nitrogen fertilized perennial ryegrass swards: effects on dry matter intake and milk production of spring calving dairy cows

M. EGAN; M. B. LYNCH; D. HENNESSY

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The current experiment was undertaken to investigate the effect of including white clover ( Trifolium repens L.; WC) into perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.; PRG) swards (PRG/WC) receiving 250 kg nitrogen (N) per hectare (ha) per year compared with PRG only swards receiving 250 kg N/ha/year, in an intensive grass-based spring calving dairy production scenario. Forty spring-calving cows were allocated to graze either a PRG/WC or PRG sward ( n = 20) from 6 February to 31 October 2012. Fresh herbage was offered daily (17 kg dry matter (DM)/cow) supplemented with concentrate in times of herbage deficit (total supplementation 507 kg/cow). Pre-grazing herbage mass (HM), sward WC content and milk production were measured for the duration of the experiment. Herbage DM intake was estimated in May, July and September. Pre-grazing HM (± s.e. ) was similar (1467 ± 173·1 kg DM/ha) for both treatments, as was cumulative herbage production (14 158 ± 769 kg DM/ha). Average WC content of the PRG/WC swards was 236 ± 30 g/kg DM. The PRG/WC cows had greater average daily milk yield and milk solids yield from June onwards. Cumulative milk yield and milk solids yield were greater for the PRG/WC cows compared with the PRG cows (5048 and 4789 ± 34·3 kg milk yield/cow, and 400 and 388 ± 1·87 kg milk solids/cow, respectively). Cows had similar DM intake in all measurements periods (15·1 ± 0·42 kg DM/cow/day). In conclusion, including WC in N-fertilized PRG swards increased milk production from cows grazing the PRG/WC swards compared with PRG, particularly in the second half of the lactation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-grazing herbage mass was similar across mixed and ryegrass-only swards.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
white clovert0
Outcome
Pre-grazing HMe0
Direction
similare0
Value
1467 ± 173·1 kg DM/hae0
Comparator
both treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-grazing HM (± s.e. ) was similar (1467 ± 173·1 kg DM/ha) for both treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover in nitrogen fertilized perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative herbage production was similar across sward treatments.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
white clovert0
Outcome
cumulative herbage productione0
Value
14 158 ± 769 kg DM/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as was cumulative herbage production (14 158 ± 769 kg DM/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover in nitrogen fertilized perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed swards averaged 236 ± 30 g/kg DM white clover.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
WC contente0
Value
236 ± 30 g/kg DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average WC content of the PRG/WC swards was 236 ± 30 g/kg DM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cows on mixed swards had greater daily milk yield and milk solids yield from June.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
PRG/WCe0
Outcome
average daily milk yield and milk solids yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
from June onwardse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PRG/WC cows had greater average daily milk yield and milk solids yield from June onwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative milk yield was greater on mixed swards, 5048 versus 4789 kg per cow.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
PRG/WCe0
Outcome
Cumulative milk yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
5048 and 4789 ± 34·3 kg milk yield/cowe0
Comparator
PRG cowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative milk yield and milk solids yield were greater for the PRG/WC cows compared with the PRG cows (5048 and 4789 ± 34·3 kg milk yield/cow, and 400 and 388 ± 1·87 kg milk solids/cow, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative milk solids yield was greater on mixed swards, 400 versus 388 kg per cow.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
PRG/WCe0
Outcome
milk solids yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
400 and 388 ± 1·87 kg milk solids/cowe0
Comparator
PRG cowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative milk yield and milk solids yield were greater for the PRG/WC cows compared with the PRG cows (5048 and 4789 ± 34·3 kg milk yield/cow, and 400 and 388 ± 1·87 kg milk solids/cow, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dry matter intake was similar across measurement periods.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
DM intakee0
Direction
similare0
Value
15·1 ± 0·42 kg DM/cow/daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cows had similar DM intake in all measurements periods (15·1 ± 0·42 kg DM/cow/day).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑

Trifolium repens · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.