Abstract
The present investigation was undertaken to find out the effective and economical control measures for the management of foliage feeding wheat aphids, for which three insecticides viz quinalphos 25 EC, thiamethoxam 25 % WG, and spinosad 45 EC were evaluated. Minimum aphid population was observed in case of quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha and was found at par with spinosad 45 EC @125 ml/ha and was found significantly better than other treatments, viz. quinalphos @1200 ml/ha and thiamethoxam 25 % WG @ 100 gm/ha including untreated check after 7 days of treatment. However, quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha and spinosad 45 EC @125 ml/ha and significantly better than other treatments including untreated check. Grain yield of plot treated with quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha was registered with highest yield (39.25 q/ha) and significantly better than other treatments including control. Cost-benefit ratio and net profit calculated for different insecticidal treatments revealed that quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha (1:9.65) was found highly cost effective as compare to other insecticides.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos at 1600 ml/ha gave minimum aphid population seven days after treatment and was at par with spinosad at 125 ml/ha.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/hae0
- Interactor
- aphidt0pest
- Outcome
- aphid populatione0
- Direction
- Minimume0
- Qualifier
- after 7 days of treatmente0
- Comparator
- spinosad 45 EC @125 ml/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimum aphid population was observed in case of quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha and was found at par with spinosad 45 EC @125 ml/ha and was found significantly better than other treatments, viz. quinalphos @1200 ml/ha and thiamethoxam 25 % WG @ 100 gm/ha including untreated check after 7 days of treatment”
t0“wheat aphid”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos at 1600 ml/ha gave the highest grain yield, 39.25 q/ha, above other treatments including control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 39.25 q/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield of plot treated with quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha was registered with highest yield (39.25 q/ha) and significantly better than other treatments including control”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos at 1600 ml/ha was the most cost effective insecticide, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:9.65.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- Cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- highly cost effectivee0
- Value
- 1:9.65e0
- Comparator
- other insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cost-benefit ratio and net profit calculated for different insecticidal treatments revealed that quinalphos 25 EC @1600 ml/ha (1:9.65) was found highly cost effective as compare to other insecticides”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
quinalphos · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.