Abstract
Efficacy of dosages of sulfoxaflor 12%SC were evaluated for the control of foliar aphids under Contract Research Project on wheat during rabi seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 at the research farm of ICAR- Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana. The standard check insecticides thiamethoxam 25WDG and quinalphos 25EC were included along with sulfoxaflor, and all the treatments were found to be significantly superior. The incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plant was significantly less with sulfoxaflor 12 SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha with 94.54, 95.27 and 96.03% reduction, respectively; these being at par with each other, followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha and quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha. The seven-spotted ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. was the main natural enemy observed in the crop, and its counts were the least (1.50/ m2) with thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ha at 14 DAS. The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha). Considering incremental cost benefit ratio, sulfoxaflor 12% SC @30 g a.i/ ha (1:2.70) is the most economical, and no phytotoxicity symptoms were observed at its doses @30 and 60 g a.i/ ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfoxaflor at 24 reduced aphids per shoot per plant by 94.54.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- sulfoxaflor 12 SC @ 24e0
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plante0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 94.54e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plant was significantly less with sulfoxaflor 12 SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha with 94.54, 95.27 and 96.03% reduction, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfoxaflor at 27 reduced aphids per shoot per plant by 95.27.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfoxaflor 12 SCe0
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plante0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 95.27e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plant was significantly less with sulfoxaflor 12 SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha with 94.54, 95.27 and 96.03% reduction, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfoxaflor at 30 reduced aphids per shoot per plant by 96.03%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfoxaflor 12 SCe0
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plante0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 96.03%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The incidence of aphids/ shoot/ plant was significantly less with sulfoxaflor 12 SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha with 94.54, 95.27 and 96.03% reduction, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The three sulfoxaflor rates were at par for aphid incidence.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- at par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these being at par with each other, followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha and quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Seven-spotted ladybird was the main natural enemy observed in wheat.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- Coccinella septempunctata L.
Coccinella septempunctatae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- main natural enemy observed in the crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seven-spotted ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. was the main natural enemy observed in the crop”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam had the lowest ladybird counts of 1.50/m2 at 14 DAS.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Coccinella septempunctata L.Coccinella septempunctatae1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- countse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 1.50/ m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its counts were the least (1.50/ m2) with thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ha at 14 DAS.”
e1“Coccinella septempunctata L.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield under sulfoxaflor 12SC was 52.21.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield under sulfoxaflor 12SC was 52.62.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield under sulfoxaflor 12SC was 54.32 q/ ha.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfoxaflor 12SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 54.32 q/ hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield under thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha was 49.87 q/ ha.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 49.87 q/ hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield under quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha was 47.73 q/ha.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 47.73 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pooled data revealed that the yield was significantly more with sulfoxaflor 12SC @ 24, 27 and 30 g a.i./ ha (52.21, 52.62 and 54.32 q/ ha) followed by thiamethoxam 25WDG @ 12.5 g a.i./ ha (49.87 q/ ha) which was at par with quinalphos 25EC @ 250 g a.i./ ha (47.73 q/ha).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfoxaflor at 30 g a.i/ha was the most economical, with incremental cost-benefit ratio 1:2.70.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- most economicale0
- Value
- 1:2.70e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sulfoxaflor 12% SC @30 g a.i/ ha (1:2.70) is the most economical”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
No phytotoxicity symptoms occurred at sulfoxaflor doses of 30 and 60 g a.i/ha.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- doses @30 and 60 g a.i/ hae0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicity symptomse0
- Direction
- noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no phytotoxicity symptoms were observed at its doses @30 and 60 g a.i/ ha.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.