Paper · 2016 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Bio-efficacy of newer pesticides against mite population on summer okra

Y.T. JADHAV; S.R. MANE; D.S. SHINDE

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The bio-efficacy results obtained after first spray, from the pooled data with respect to effect of different treatments against mite infestation revealed that propargite @ 1500ml a.i./ha proved to be the best treatment showing maximum reduction of mites in 6.25cm 2 leaf area/ 3 leaves followed by fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofol which were also highly effective against mites indicating results at par with the best treatment in reducing mite population on okra while during second spray fenazaquin was the best pesticide followed by propargite, spiromesifen, dicofol, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyr which were highly effective and at par with the best treatment against mites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propargite at 1500 ml a.i./ha was the best treatment, giving the maximum reduction of mites on okra after the first spray.

Treatment
propargite @ 1500ml a.i./hae1
Interactor
mitese1pest
Outcome
mitese1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Qualifier
after first spraye0
Comparator
fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofole1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The bio-efficacy results obtained after first spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“propargite @ 1500ml a.i./ha proved to be the best treatment showing maximum reduction of mites in 6.25cm 2 leaf area/ 3 leaves followed by fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofol were highly effective against mites on okra, at par with the best treatment.

Treatment
fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofole1
Interactor
mitese2pest
Outcome
mitese2
Direction
highly effectivee2
Qualifier
after first spraye0
Comparator
best treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The bio-efficacy results obtained after first spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“fenazaquin, spiromecifen and dicofol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“which were also highly effective against mites indicating results at par with the best treatment in reducing mite population on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the second spray, fenazaquin was the best pesticide against mites on okra.

Treatment
fenazaquine3
Interactor
mitese4pest
Outcome
mitese4
Direction
beste3
Qualifier
during second spraye3
Comparator
propargite, spiromesifen, dicofol, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyre3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“during second spray fenazaquin was the best pesticide followed by propargite, spiromesifen, dicofol, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–606 · show in text ↑
e4

“which were highly effective and at par with the best treatment against mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the second spray, propargite, spiromesifen and dicofol were highly effective against mites on okra, at par with the best treatment.

Treatment
propargite, spiromesifen, dicofole3
Interactor
mitese4pest
Outcome
mitese4
Direction
highly effectivee4
Qualifier
during second spraye3
Comparator
best treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“during second spray fenazaquin was the best pesticide followed by propargite, spiromesifen, dicofol, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–606 · show in text ↑
e4

“which were highly effective and at par with the best treatment against mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the second spray, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyr were highly effective against mites on okra, at par with the best treatment.

Treatment
diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyre3
Interactor
mitese4pest
Outcome
mitese4
Direction
highly effectivee4
Qualifier
during second spraye3
Comparator
best treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“during second spray fenazaquin was the best pesticide followed by propargite, spiromesifen, dicofol, diafenthiuron and chlorfenapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–606 · show in text ↑
e4

“which were highly effective and at par with the best treatment against mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–683 · show in text ↑

propargite · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

dicofol · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorfenapyr · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

diafenthiuron · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spiromesifen · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fenazaquin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.