Paper · 1982 · University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi)

Control of farley fly delia, flavibasis stein (diptera: Anthomyiidae) with resistant varieties and insecticides

M. Macharia

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Control of barley fly Dolia fla7ibasis Stein (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) with resistant varieties and insecticides. Field experiment awere carried out to determine the effects of infestation of D. flavibasis on growth and yield of barley. The effects of the attack on the malting quality and commercial value of harvested barley crop was also assessed. Attacked plans suffered a check in their growth and were observed to compensate by recovery growth. The slow rate of development and compensatory growth delayed ripening. In attacked barley, the shoots developed unevenly and the ears did not ripen evenly. D. flavibasis infestation caused high yield losses. Highest yield losses occurred in varieties Proctor, Tumaini, K. Research and MP'IT 169 - 2Y. The lowest yield loss occurred in Can B35/2. However, E. flavibasis attack did not affect the grain quality, hence no effect on the malting quality of barley. The pest incidence did not reduce the commercial value of the harvested barley crop. Five barley varieties viz Procter, K. Research, Tumaini, MP"J.'"T 169 - 2Y and Can B35/2 were tested in the field to compare their resistance to D.flavibasis. Despite variation in results, Can B35/2 be identified as moderately resistant variety useful for reference in further work. The barley varieties were observed to recover their growth after the infestation. Although it was difficult to identify the mechanism of resistance, visual growth recover scores in the field experiments suggested some form of tolerance. However, observed grain yield differences between varieties indicated resistance could be due to many unknown factors such as environmental or varietal yield potential. The response of barley varieties to attack by flavibasis was studied in the greenhouse. The effects of infestation were quantified. 'Barley plants infested with D. flavibasis larvae at 11 - 12 growth stages were virtually killed, while plants infested at 13th growth stage survived. Infested plants suffered. a check in their growth and development but were later observed to recover their growth. Also in response to attack proportionately more tillers were produced by infested plants. This suggested tolerance as the mechanism of resistance. Field experiments carried out on the chemical control of barley fly Q. flavibasis showed carbofuran 5c granules as an outstanding preventive seed-dress treatment, with 4Kg a.i/Ha giving lCC%control to D. flavibasis larvae. Aldrin 4CDk wettable powder was the second effective seed-dress treatment. Phosphamidon 5 S.C.w. and trichlorphon 95 S .P. were the most promising foliar sn.ray insecticides evaluated for control of D. flavibasis larvae on barley. Applications of seed-dressings of both carbofuran granules and aldrin 40J.t wettable powder for control of D. flavibasis larvae significantly improved grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attacked barley plants had checked growth followed by compensatory recovery.

Outcome
check in their growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Attacked plans suffered a check in their growth and were observed to compensate by recovery growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attack delayed barley ripening through slow development and compensatory growth.

Outcome
delayed ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slow rate of development and compensatory growth delayed ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attacked barley shoots developed unevenly and ears ripened unevenly.

Outcome
shoots developed unevenly and the ears did not ripen evenlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In attacked barley, the shoots developed unevenly and the ears did not ripen evenly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–603 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. flavibasis infestation caused high barley yield losses.

Interactor
D. flavibasise0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D. flavibasis infestation caused high yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield losses were highest in Proctor, Tumaini, K. Research, and MP'IT 169 - 2Y.

Material
Proctor, Tumaini, K. Research and MP'IT 169 - 2Ye0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yield losses occurred in varieties Proctor, Tumaini, K. Research and MP'IT 169 - 2Y”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Can B35/2 had the lowest yield loss.

Material
Can B35/2e0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield loss occurred in Can B35/2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The attack did not affect barley grain or malting quality.

Outcome
grain quality, hence no effect on the malting qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. flavibasis attack did not affect the grain quality, hence no effect on the malting quality of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest incidence did not reduce commercial value of harvested barley.

Outcome
commercial valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pest incidence did not reduce the commercial value of the harvested barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Can B35/2 was identified as moderately resistant.

Material
Can B35/2e0
Outcome
moderately resistant varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Can B35/2 be identified as moderately resistant variety useful for reference in further work”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley attacked at stages 11–12 was nearly killed, while plants attacked at stage 13 survived.

Interactor
D. flavibasise0
Outcome
virtually killede0
Qualifier
11 - 12 growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Barley plants infested with D. flavibasis larvae at 11 - 12 growth stages were virtually killed, while plants infested at 13th growth stage survived”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–1964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested barley produced proportionately more tillers.

Outcome
more tillerse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in response to attack proportionately more tillers were produced by infested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2169 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran seed dressing at 4Kg a.i/Ha gave complete larval control.

Treatment
carbofuran 5c granulese0
Outcome
control to D. flavibasis larvaee0
Direction
lCC%controle0
Value
lCC%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbofuran 5c granules as an outstanding preventive seed-dress treatment, with 4Kg a.i/Ha giving lCC%control to D. flavibasis larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2317–2449 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldrin was the second effective seed dressing.

Treatment
Aldrin 4CDk wettable powdere0
Outcome
second effective seed-dress treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aldrin 4CDk wettable powder was the second effective seed-dress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2451–2524 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphamidon and trichlorphon were promising foliar controls of larvae.

Outcome
control of D. flavibasis larvaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphamidon 5 S.C.w. and trichlorphon 95 S .P. were the most promising foliar sn.ray insecticides evaluated for control of D. flavibasis larvae on barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2526–2680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran seed dressing significantly improved barley grain yield.

Treatment
carbofuran granulese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-dressings of both carbofuran granules and aldrin 40J.t wettable powder for control of D. flavibasis larvae significantly improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2698–2844 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldrin seed dressing significantly improved barley grain yield.

Treatment
aldrin 40J.t wettable powdere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-dressings of both carbofuran granules and aldrin 40J.t wettable powder for control of D. flavibasis larvae significantly improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2698–2844 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and yield of barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · pest · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbofuran · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.