Abstract
The banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is an important pest of highland banana in East and central Africa. It causes yield loss of up to 100% in heavily infested fields. Studies were carried out in Uganda to evaluate the efficacy of the the plant base incision trap in attracting C. sordidus and to determine the potential of using the trap in enhancing dissemination of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana for the pest control. Field experiments were carried out in an established banana field of C. sordidus susceptible East African Highland Banana cultivar, Nabusa (AAA-EA). There were significantly more weevils recaptured in the incision trap (14.4%) than the conventional pseudostem trap (4.7%). After laboratory incubation, more weevils died due to pathogen infection from plots where the incision trap was used in combination with B. bassiana (25.9%) compared to where the pathogen was applied around the plant base without the incision (15.9%). Weevils showing signs of mycosis were recovered at 6 and 9 m from the pathogen release point, suggesting that the weevils can pick the pathogen from the aggregation point and disperse it. This data demonstrates that the incision trap is more attractive to C. sordidus than the conventional pseudostem trap and might be used to enhance dissemination of B. bassiana among adults. Key words: Entomopathogenic fungi, horizontal transmission, pseudostem trap.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Incision traps recaptured 14.4% of banana weevils versus 4.7% for pseudostem traps.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- incision trape0
- Interactor
- Cosmopolites sordidus
Cosmopolites sordidust0pest - Outcome
- weevils recapturede0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 14.4%e0
- Qualifier
- 4.7%e0
- Comparator
- conventional pseudostem trape0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly more weevils recaptured in the incision trap (14.4%) than the conventional pseudostem trap (4.7%)”
t0“banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining incision traps with B. bassiana increased infected weevil mortality to 25.9% versus 15.9% without incision.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- incision trap was used in combination with B. bassianae0
- Interactor
- Cosmopolites sordidus
Cosmopolites sordidust0pest - Second interactor
- B. bassiana
Beauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- weevils died due to pathogen infectione0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 25.9%e0
- Qualifier
- 15.9%e0
- Comparator
- pathogen was applied around the plant base without the incisione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“more weevils died due to pathogen infection from plots where the incision trap was used in combination with B. bassiana (25.9%) compared to where the pathogen was applied around the plant base without the incision (15.9%)”
t0“banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycotic weevils were recovered 6 and 9 m from the pathogen release point.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Interactor
- Cosmopolites sordidus
Cosmopolites sordidust0pest - Outcome
- Weevils showing signs of mycosise0
- Value
- 6 and 9 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weevils showing signs of mycosis were recovered at 6 and 9 m from the pathogen release point”
t0“banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus”
The same questions in other papers
Beauveria bassiana · Cosmopolites sordidus · MusaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →trap barrier · Cosmopolites sordidus · MusaPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.