Paper · 2016 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Co-inoculation with rhizobacteria in association with humic acid and nitrogen on common bean development

de Oliveira Ara uacute jo Eacute rica; Guimar atilde es Gerola Juliana; Ricardo Rocha Juan; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies on co-inoculation of strains with high symbiotic potential, as well as the use of humic substances are of great importance for obtaining increases in nodulation, biological nitrogen fixation and yield of the bean crop. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of the co-inoculation of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense in association with humic acids and nitrogen (N) on the behavior of different bean genotypes, cultivated in a protected environment. The experiment was carried out at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia, Campus of Colorado do Oeste-RO, Brazil, from February to April 2015. The experimental design was completely randomized, with four replicates. Common bean seeds of the cultivars ‘Pérola’ and ‘BRS Esplendor’ were previously co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Rizhobium tropici. Shoot dry matter production in the cultivar ‘Pérola’ increased by 76.12% when co-inoculated with rhizobacteria. N use efficiency in the bean cultivar ‘Pérola’ is higher when co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Rizhobium tropici, confirming that co-inoculation alone is sufficient to provide the N necessary for plant development. Key words: Phaseolus vulgaris L., Rhizobium tropici, Azospirillum brasilense, biological N fixation (BNF).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial co-inoculation increased shoot dry matter production in Pérola by 76.12%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
‘Pérola’e0
Treatment
co-inoculated with rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
Shoot dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
76.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry matter production in the cultivar ‘Pérola’ increased by 76.12% when co-inoculated with rhizobacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and Rizhobium tropici increased nitrogen use efficiency in Pérola.

Taxon
beane0
Material
‘Pérola’e0
Treatment
co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Rizhobium tropicie0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Second interactor
Rizhobium tropicie0symbiont
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N use efficiency in the bean cultivar ‘Pérola’ is higher when co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Rizhobium tropici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that co-inoculation alone supplies enough nitrogen for bean development.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
co-inoculation alone is sufficient to provide the N necessary for plant developmente0

Verbatim

e0

“confirming that co-inoculation alone is sufficient to provide the N necessary for plant development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: efficiency · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.