Paper · 2016 · Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia

Yield and Quality of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. Capitata) Under Organic Growing Media Using Vermicompost and Earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus Inoculation

N. Nurhidayati; Usman Ali; Indiyah Murwani

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of three kinds of vermicompost materials and P.corethrurus population on plant yield and quality of cabbage under organic growing media compared with inorganic treatment. The factorial blockrandomized design was used for this experiment which consisting of two factors. The first factor is the kind of vermicompost material which consists of three levels (the mixture of mushrooms media waste, cow manure, and vegetable wastes (V1), mushrooms media waste, cow manure and leaf litter (V2), mushrooms media waste, cow manure, vegetable wastes and leaf litter (V3). The second factor is the population of P. corethrurus consisted of five levels (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 indiv.m-2) and one control treatment (inorganic treatment). The results showed that the application of various vermicompost had significantly (p< 0.05) higher yields than the inorganic treatment. Interaction between the kind of vermicompost and P.coretrurus population affected sigbificantly(p< 0.05) yield and quality of cabbage. Vermicompost V1 and V2gave a high yield with population by 0-25 and 50 indiv.m-2, respectively. Vermicompost V3 gave a highyield without inoculation of earthworm P.corethrurus. Based on the quality parameters, the vermicompost V1 and V2 with population by 0-50 indiv.m-2and V3 with population by 25 indiv.m-2 gave the best quality of cabbage. Cabbage treated with those three kinds of vermicompost increased contents of sugar and vitamin C by average 12% and 57%, respectively. Storage loss (% of initial mass) showed decrease average value by 23%underthe treatment of 7days storage at room temperature (25oC) and 8% underthe treatment of 14 days storage at cold temperature (5oC) compared with the inorganic treatment by 85% and 18%, respectively. The results suggest that the application of vermicompostcan increase the yield and quality of cabbage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Various vermicomposts significantly increased cabbage yield compared with inorganic treatment.

Treatment
various vermicomposte0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of various vermicompost had significantly (p< 0.05) higher yields than the inorganic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost kind and earthworm population interacted significantly in their effect on cabbage yield.

Treatment
kind of vermicomposte0
Interactor
P.coretruruse0other
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction between the kind of vermicompost and P.coretrurus population affected sigbificantly(p< 0.05) yield and quality of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1047 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost kind and earthworm population interacted significantly in their effect on cabbage quality.

Treatment
kind of vermicomposte0
Interactor
P.coretruruse0other
Outcome
quality of cabbagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction between the kind of vermicompost and P.coretrurus population affected sigbificantly(p< 0.05) yield and quality of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 vermicompost gave high cabbage yield with 0-25 earthworms per square meter.

Treatment
Vermicompost V1e0
Outcome
high yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
0-25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vermicompost V1 and V2gave a high yield with population by 0-25 and 50 indiv.m-2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V2 vermicompost gave high cabbage yield with 50 earthworms per square meter.

Treatment
V2e0
Outcome
high yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
50 indiv.m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vermicompost V1 and V2gave a high yield with population by 0-25 and 50 indiv.m-2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V3 vermicompost gave high cabbage yield without earthworm inoculation.

Treatment
Vermicompost V3e0
Interactor
P.corethrurusPontoscolex corethruruse0other
Outcome
highyielde0
Direction
highyielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pontoscolex corethrurus
Pontoscolex corethrurus · InteractorEmerson Bezerra · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vermicompost V3 gave a highyield without inoculation of earthworm P.corethrurus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1224 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 and V2 vermicomposts with 0-50 earthworms per square meter gave the best cabbage quality.

Treatment
vermicompost V1 and V2e0
Outcome
quality of cabbagee0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
0-50 indiv.m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“the vermicompost V1 and V2 with population by 0-50 indiv.m-2and V3 with population by 25 indiv.m-2 gave the best quality of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V3 vermicompost with 25 earthworms per square meter gave the best cabbage quality.

Treatment
V3e0
Outcome
quality of cabbagee0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
25 indiv.m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“V3 with population by 25 indiv.m-2 gave the best quality of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased cabbage sugar content by an average 12%.

Treatment
three kinds of vermicomposte0
Outcome
contents of sugare0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
inorganic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabbage treated with those three kinds of vermicompost increased contents of sugar and vitamin C by average 12% and 57%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1525 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the inorganic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased cabbage vitamin C content by an average 57%.

Treatment
three kinds of vermicomposte0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
inorganic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabbage treated with those three kinds of vermicompost increased contents of sugar and vitamin C by average 12% and 57%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1525 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the inorganic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25oC for 7 days, vermicompost treatment had average cabbage storage loss of 23% versus 85% for inorganic treatment.

Treatment
treatment of 7days storage at room temperature (25oC)e0
Outcome
Storage loss (% of initial mass)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
85%e0
Comparator
inorganic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage loss (% of initial mass) showed decrease average value by 23%underthe treatment of 7days storage at room temperature (25oC) and 8% underthe treatment of 14 days storage at cold temperature (5oC) compared with the inorganic treatment by 85% and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5oC for 14 days, vermicompost treatment had average cabbage storage loss of 8% versus 18% for inorganic treatment.

Treatment
treatment of 14 days storage at cold temperature (5oC)e0
Outcome
Storage loss (% of initial mass)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
18%e0
Comparator
inorganic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage loss (% of initial mass) showed decrease average value by 23%underthe treatment of 7days storage at room temperature (25oC) and 8% underthe treatment of 14 days storage at cold temperature (5oC) compared with the inorganic treatment by 85% and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1796 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest applying vermicompost to increase cabbage yield and quality.

Outcome
application of vermicompostcan increase the yield and quality of cabbagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of vermicompostcan increase the yield and quality of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1899 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.