Abstract
Tribal farming in Kendujhar district of Odisha, India is primarily based on traditional shifting cultivation which is becoming unsustainable - resulting in natural resources degradation, reduced production efficiency, and threatened food security. As maize (Zea mays L.) was the primary field crop grown by the tribal farmers, maize-based Conservation Agriculture Production Systems (CAPS) were taken as an innovative approach for conserving resources, enhancing productivity and sustaining livelihood through minimum soil disturbance, permanent organic soil cover, and adoption of diversified crop rotation. An on-station experiment was conducted in Kendujhar during June 2011 to March 2012 to estimate the effect of CAPS on yield and soil properties. The experiment was laid in a split plot design with four treatments and three replications. The treatment combinations comprised of two factors each at two levels: tillage (minimum and conventional), and cropping system (maize and maize+cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)). The maize seed yield both in conventional and minimum tillage were comparable, though it was highest in maize+cowpea under minimum tillage (5610 kg/ha). Maize+cowpea intercropping produced comparable seed yield (4955 kg/ha) to that of sole maize cropping (4825 kg/ha). As cowpea was an additional output without any reduction in maize seed yield and had high market value, maize+cowpea intercropping under minimum tillage recorded a highest net profit of $655/ha. Though there was no significant effect of CAPS on soil properties in the experimental year, it can be assessed over multiple years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Maize seed yields were comparable under conventional and minimum tillage.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maize seed yield both in conventional and minimum tillage were comparable”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize with cowpea under minimum tillage had the highest seed yield, 5610 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was highest in maize+cowpea under minimum tillage (5610 kg/ha)”
e1“The maize seed yield both in conventional and minimum tillage were comparable”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize–cowpea intercropping gave comparable maize seed yield to sole maize, at 4955 and 4825 kg/ha respectively.
- Treatment
- Maize+cowpea intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Value
- 4955 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4825 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- sole maize croppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize+cowpea intercropping produced comparable seed yield (4955 kg/ha) to that of sole maize cropping (4825 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea was an additional output without reducing maize seed yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cowpea was an additional output without any reduction in maize seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize–cowpea intercropping under minimum tillage gave the highest net profit, $655/ha.
- Treatment
- maize+cowpea intercropping under minimum tillagee0
- Outcome
- net profite0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- $655/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maize+cowpea intercropping under minimum tillage recorded a highest net profit of $655/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
CAPS had no significant effect on soil properties in the experimental year.
- Treatment
- CAPSe0
- Outcome
- soil propertiese0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
- Qualifier
- in the experimental yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant effect of CAPS on soil properties in the experimental year”
e1“maize-based Conservation Agriculture Production Systems (CAPS)”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.