Paper · 2015 · Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe

Evaluation of the Effect of the Tillage System and Weed Control on the Yield of Flax Fibre and Its Quality

Jerzy Mańkowski; Krzysztof Pudełko

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

*Poznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, ul. Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznan Poland, E-mail: bioline@home.pl Abstract Fibrous flax, despite its many different uses, is currently growing within a relatively small area, mainly because of the low production margin. This study shows possible approaches to the reduce production costs of flax fibre by 424 PLN per hectare as a result of no-tillage cultivation and direct sowing. No such research on flax fibre production has been conducted so far. The study (carried in 2011-2012) covered highly differentiated temperature and precipitation conditions. The yields of homomorphic fibre in a dry year were higher than in a year with optimum precipitation in the no-till system comparing to conventional tillage. The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase. Tillage systems and herbicides differentiated the length and linear density of homomorphic fibre and impurity content, whereas the elongation at break and tenacity did not depend on the cultivation method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage and direct sowing reduced production costs by 424 PLN per hectare.

Treatment
no-tillage cultivation and direct sowinge0
Outcome
production costs of flax fibree0
Direction
reducee0
Value
424 PLN per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduce production costs of flax fibre by 424 PLN per hectare as a result of no-tillage cultivation and direct sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till fibre yields were higher in the dry year than in the optimal precipitation year relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-till systeme0
Outcome
yields of homomorphic fibree0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in a dry yeare0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of homomorphic fibre in a dry year were higher than in a year with optimum precipitation in the no-till system comparing to conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel 75WG increased fibre yield.

Treatment
Chisel 75WGe0
Outcome
yield of fibree0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel 75WG increased straw yield and fibre content.

Treatment
Chisel 75WGe1
Outcome
straw yield and fibre contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and herbicide treatments differentiated fibre length, linear density and impurity content.

Treatment
Tillage systems and herbicidese0
Outcome
length and linear density of homomorphic fibre and impurity contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage systems and herbicides differentiated the length and linear density of homomorphic fibre and impurity content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elongation at break and tenacity did not depend on cultivation method.

Treatment
cultivation methode0
Outcome
elongation at break and tenacitye0
Direction
did not depende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the elongation at break and tenacity did not depend on the cultivation method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax Fibre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Chisel 75WG increased the yield of fibre regardless of the weather and cultivation system and was the result of both straw yield and fibre content increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–966 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: grain · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.