Paper · 2016 · Pharmaceutical Biology

Physiological characteristics, dry matter, and active component accumulation patterns of Changium smyrnioides in response to a light intensity gradient

Chang-lin Wang; Qiao-sheng Guo; Zai-biao Zhu; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

CONTEXT: Changium smyrnioides Wolff (Apiaceae) is an endangered medicinal plant with numerous pharmacological uses. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of light intensity levels on the growth and accumulation of secondary metabolites of C. smyrnioides, cultivated seedlings were subjected to different relative light intensities via sun-shading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changium smyrnioides seedlings were subjected to five irradiance treatments (100, 60.54, 44.84, 31.39, and 10.56% sunlight) in glasshouse for 9 months. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants with spectrophotometric method, photosynthetic parameters with Li-6400XT, dry matter accumulation and active component contents in the root with spectrophotometric and HPLC method were analyzed. RESULTS: ·s) and dry root weight (5.07 g) were achieved under 60.54% sunlight. Lower relative light intensity levels stimulated the accumulation levels of bioactive compounds in the roots so that the highest contents of mannitol (1.35%) and choline (405.58 μg/g) were recorded under 31.39% sunlight, and the highest polysaccharide content (10.80%) were achieved under 44.84% sunlight. With a decrease in the relative light intensity levels, the water-soluble component content increased first and then decreased. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results revealed that 31.39-60.54% sunlight serve as appropriate relative light intensity conditions for cultivated C. smyrnioides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry root weight reached 5.07 g under 60.54% sunlight.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Treatment
60.54% sunlighte0
Outcome
dry root weighte0
Value
5.07 ge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“dry root weight (5.07 g) were achieved under 60.54% sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light intensity stimulated root bioactive compound accumulation.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Lower relative light intensity levelse0
Outcome
accumulation levels of bioactive compoundse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Verbatim

e0

“Lower relative light intensity levels stimulated the accumulation levels of bioactive compounds in the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mannitol content reached 1.35% at 31.39% sunlight.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Treatment
31.39% sunlighte0
Outcome
mannitole0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.35%e0

Verbatim

e0

“highest contents of mannitol (1.35%) and choline (405.58 μg/g) were recorded under 31.39% sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root choline content reached 405.58 μg/g at 31.39% sunlight.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Treatment
31.39% sunlighte0
Outcome
cholinee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
405.58 μg/ge0

Verbatim

e0

“highest contents of mannitol (1.35%) and choline (405.58 μg/g) were recorded under 31.39% sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root polysaccharide content reached 10.80% at 44.84% sunlight.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Treatment
44.84% sunlighte0
Outcome
polysaccharide contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.80%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest polysaccharide content (10.80%) were achieved under 44.84% sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soluble component content rose then fell as light intensity decreased.

Taxon
Changium smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidest0
Treatment
decrease in the relative light intensity levelse0
Outcome
water-soluble component contente0
Direction
increased first and then decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“With a decrease in the relative light intensity levels, the water-soluble component content increased first and then decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changium smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 31.39 to 60.54% sunlight as appropriate for cultivation.

Taxon
C. smyrnioidesChangium smyrnioidese0
Outcome
31.39-60.54% sunlight serve as appropriate relative light intensity conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“31.39-60.54% sunlight serve as appropriate relative light intensity conditions for cultivated C. smyrnioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1432 · show in text ↑