Paper · 1990 · HortScience

RESPONSE OF OKRA TRANSPLANTS GROWN UNDER VisPore ROW COVER AND PLASTIC MULCH

V. A. Khan; C. Stevens; J. E. Brown

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Early okra production was evaluated using `Clemson Spineless' transplants grown under clear polyethylene mulch plus VisPore row cover (VCM), black polyethylene mulch plus VisPore row cover (VBM), clear polyethylene mulch (CM), black polyethylene mulch (BM) and bare soil (BS) for two years. Early yield (1st four harvests in early June) was significantly greater for VCM treatment while total marketable yield at the end of 8 wks were significantly greater for VCM, BM, and VBM treatments, respectively in both years. Enterprise budget analysis showed that VCM and BM treatments had the highest net-return to management on a per acre basis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear mulch plus VisPore row cover significantly increased early yield.

Treatment
VCM treatmente0
Outcome
Early yielde0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Qualifier
1st four harvests in early Junee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early yield (1st four harvests in early June) was significantly greater for VCM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–380 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

VCM significantly increased total marketable yield.

Treatment
VCMe0
Outcome
total marketable yielde0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Qualifier
at the end of 8 wkse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total marketable yield at the end of 8 wks were significantly greater for VCM, BM, and VBM treatments, respectively in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mulch significantly increased total marketable yield.

Treatment
BMe0
Outcome
total marketable yielde0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Qualifier
at the end of 8 wkse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total marketable yield at the end of 8 wks were significantly greater for VCM, BM, and VBM treatments, respectively in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mulch plus VisPore row cover significantly increased total marketable yield.

Treatment
VBMe0
Outcome
total marketable yielde0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Qualifier
at the end of 8 wkse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total marketable yield at the end of 8 wks were significantly greater for VCM, BM, and VBM treatments, respectively in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VCM produced one of the highest net returns per acre.

Treatment
VCMe0
Outcome
net-return to management on a per acre basise0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VCM and BM treatments had the highest net-return to management on a per acre basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM produced one of the highest net returns per acre.

Treatment
BMe0
Outcome
net-return to management on a per acre basise0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VCM and BM treatments had the highest net-return to management on a per acre basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.