Paper · 2015 · Mordovia University Bulletin

MULCH AND IRRIGATION EFFECTS ON TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION

M. K. Shahadat; M. A. Rahman; M. G. Miah; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

for determining the effects of irrigation and mulch on the performance of tomato. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications where mulch materials (Senna leaf, rice straw and no-mulch) were assigned in main plots, while five irrigation levels (IW/CEP 1.0, IW/CEP 0.75, IW/CEP 0.50, IW/CEP 0.25, and IW/CEP 0.0) were distributed in subplots. Senna leaf mulch gave 4.64 % and 25.02% higher tomato yield than rice straw and no mulch treatment, respectively. IW/CPE 1.0 produced 5.64 %, 13.40 %, 33.04 %, and 87.65 % more yield compared to IW/CPE 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and no irrigation levels, respectively. Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 level of irrigation produced the highest (58.54 t ha -1 ) yield, which did not vary significantly with rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0 (56.89 t ha -1 ) and Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 0.75 (56.73 t ha -1 ). Reducing sugar, total sugar and ascorbic acid were increased with the decreasing irrigation levels, but carotene increased with increasing irrigation levels. Weed was suppressed significantly under mulch materials than no mulch treatment. Therefore, Senna leaf could be used as potential mulch material for soil moisture conservation, higher tomato yield and weed suppression. About 26 % irrigation water could be saved without significant yield loss if Senna leaf is used as mulch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senna leaf mulch gave 4.64% higher tomato yield than rice straw.

Treatment
Senna leaf mulche1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.64 %e1
Comparator
rice strawe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Senna leaf mulch gave 4.64 % and 25.02% higher tomato yield than rice straw and no mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senna leaf mulch gave 25.02% higher tomato yield than no mulch.

Treatment
Senna leaf mulche1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
25.02%e1
Comparator
no mulch treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Senna leaf mulch gave 4.64 % and 25.02% higher tomato yield than rice straw and no mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 gave 5.64% more tomato yield than IW/CPE 0.75.

Treatment
IW/CPE 1.0e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
5.64 %e2
Comparator
IW/CPE 0.75e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“IW/CPE 1.0 produced 5.64 %, 13.40 %, 33.04 %, and 87.65 % more yield compared to IW/CPE 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and no irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 gave 13.40% more tomato yield than IW/CPE 0.50.

Treatment
IW/CPE 1.0e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
13.40 %e2
Comparator
0.50e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“IW/CPE 1.0 produced 5.64 %, 13.40 %, 33.04 %, and 87.65 % more yield compared to IW/CPE 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and no irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 gave 33.04% more tomato yield than IW/CPE 0.25.

Treatment
IW/CPE 1.0e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
33.04 %e2
Comparator
0.25e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“IW/CPE 1.0 produced 5.64 %, 13.40 %, 33.04 %, and 87.65 % more yield compared to IW/CPE 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and no irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 gave 87.65% more tomato yield than no irrigation.

Treatment
IW/CPE 1.0e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
87.65 %e2
Comparator
no irrigation levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“IW/CPE 1.0 produced 5.64 %, 13.40 %, 33.04 %, and 87.65 % more yield compared to IW/CPE 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and no irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 irrigation gave the highest tomato yield, 58.54 t ha -1.

Treatment
Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 level of irrigatione3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
58.54 t ha -1e3
Comparator
rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 level of irrigation produced the highest (58.54 t ha -1 ) yield, which did not vary significantly with rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0 (56.89 t ha -1 ) and Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 0.75 (56.73 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 irrigation did not vary significantly in tomato yield from rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0.

Treatment
Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
56.89 t ha -1e3
Comparator
rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 1.0 level of irrigation produced the highest (58.54 t ha -1 ) yield, which did not vary significantly with rice straw with IW/CPE 1.0 (56.89 t ha -1 ) and Senna leaf mulch with IW/CPE 0.75 (56.73 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–866 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing sugar, total sugar and ascorbic acid of tomato increased as irrigation levels decreased.

Treatment
decreasing irrigation levelse4
Outcome
Reducing sugar, total sugar and ascorbic acide4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“Reducing sugar, total sugar and ascorbic acid were increased with the decreasing irrigation levels, but carotene increased with increasing irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1024 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotene of tomato increased with increasing irrigation levels.

Treatment
increasing irrigation levelse4
Outcome
carotenee4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“Reducing sugar, total sugar and ascorbic acid were increased with the decreasing irrigation levels, but carotene increased with increasing irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation was significantly suppressed under mulch materials compared with no mulch.

Treatment
mulch materialse5
Interactor
Weede5weed
Outcome
Weede5
Direction
suppressede5
Comparator
no mulch treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“Weed was suppressed significantly under mulch materials than no mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Senna leaf as a potential mulch material for tomato.

Treatment
Senna leafe6
Outcome
Senna leaf could be used as potential mulch materiale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Therefore, Senna leaf could be used as potential mulch material for soil moisture conservation, higher tomato yield and weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1243 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

About 26% irrigation water could be saved with Senna leaf mulch without significant yield loss.

Treatment
Senna leaf is used as mulche7
Outcome
irrigation water could be savede7
Value
26 %e7
Qualifier
without significant yield losse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO PERFORMANCE AND WEED INFESTATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–71 · show in text ↑
e7

“About 26 % irrigation water could be saved without significant yield loss if Senna leaf is used as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1349 · show in text ↑

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.