Paper · 2017 · Crop Science

The Future of Lr34 in Modern, High‐Input Wheat Breeding Programs

Paul A. Johnston; Catherine Munro; Ruth C. Butler; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lr34 is an important adult plant resistance gene that is effective against a number of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) diseases and has proved durable for over 100 yr. However, the energy requirements of Lr34 resistance, combined with the pleiotrophic effect of leaf tip necrosis, can result in reduced yield potential. To evaluate the absence of Lr34 from elite breeding material, a cross was made between similar‐yielding, milling wheat cultivars ‘Conquest’ ( Lr34sus ) and ‘Bakker Gold’ ( Lr34res ). Independent lines were carried forward and, at the F 4 stage, sister pairs were selected for the different homozygous alleles of the marker csLV34, corresponding to Lr34res or Lr34sus . These lines were further selfed to produce nine stable F 8 pairs ( Lr34res and Lr34sus ) for field trialing and evaluation over 3 yr under a range of fungicide treatments. In the absence of fungicide and with natural infections of stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici ) and leaf rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Lr34res lines had lower disease severity, increased total yield, and better grain quality than Lr34sus lines. This pattern was reversed under full fungicide control, as Lr34sus lines displayed higher mean plot yield (2010: +4.3%, p < 0.001; 2012: +4.4%, p < 0.001) and possessed superior grain quality data than the Lr34res lines. The high‐yield, high‐input farming environment and the use of full fungicide control in New Zealand's current wheat cultivar trialing system means that genetic sources of rust resistance such as Lr34 provide little or no competitive advantage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fungicide, Lr34res wheat lines had lower disease severity than Lr34sus lines under natural stripe and leaf rust infection.

Material
Lr34res linese0
Interactor
Puccinia striiformis f.sp. triticiPuccinia striiformis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Second interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinae0pathogen
Gene
Lr34rese0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Lr34sus linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici · InteractorBrauna55 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of fungicide and with natural infections of stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici ) and leaf rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Lr34res lines had lower disease severity, increased total yield, and better grain quality than Lr34sus lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fungicide, Lr34res lines yielded more than Lr34sus lines under natural rust infection.

Interactor
Puccinia striiformis f.sp. triticiPuccinia striiformis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Second interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinae0pathogen
Gene
Lr34rese0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Lr34sus linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici · InteractorBrauna55 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of fungicide and with natural infections of stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici ) and leaf rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Lr34res lines had lower disease severity, increased total yield, and better grain quality than Lr34sus lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fungicide, Lr34res lines had better grain quality than Lr34sus lines.

Gene
Lr34rese0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Lr34sus linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of fungicide and with natural infections of stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici ) and leaf rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Lr34res lines had lower disease severity, increased total yield, and better grain quality than Lr34sus lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With full fungicide control, Lr34sus lines had higher mean plot yield in 2010 than Lr34res lines.

Gene
Lr34suse0
Outcome
mean plot yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
+4.3%e0
Qualifier
2010e0
Comparator
Lr34res linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This pattern was reversed under full fungicide control, as Lr34sus lines displayed higher mean plot yield (2010: +4.3%, p < 0.001; 2012: +4.4%, p < 0.001) and possessed superior grain quality data than the Lr34res lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With full fungicide control, Lr34sus lines had higher mean plot yield in 2012 than Lr34res lines.

Gene
Lr34suse0
Outcome
mean plot yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
+4.4%e0
Qualifier
2012e0
Comparator
Lr34res linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This pattern was reversed under full fungicide control, as Lr34sus lines displayed higher mean plot yield (2010: +4.3%, p < 0.001; 2012: +4.4%, p < 0.001) and possessed superior grain quality data than the Lr34res lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With full fungicide control, Lr34sus lines had superior grain quality to Lr34res lines.

Gene
Lr34suse0
Outcome
grain quality datae0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Lr34res linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This pattern was reversed under full fungicide control, as Lr34sus lines displayed higher mean plot yield (2010: +4.3%, p < 0.001; 2012: +4.4%, p < 0.001) and possessed superior grain quality data than the Lr34res lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Breeding Programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude Lr34 provides little or no competitive advantage in the current high-input New Zealand trial system with full fungicide control.

Gene
Lr34e0
Outcome
little or no competitive advantagee0
Setting
New Zealande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high‐yield, high‐input farming environment and the use of full fungicide control in New Zealand's current wheat cultivar trialing system means that genetic sources of rust resistance such as Lr34 provide little or no competitive advantage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1581 · show in text ↑