Abstract
Egypt, from 30 th May, 2015 to 11 th March, 2016 to study the effect of storage periods, packages types and treating wheat grains with natural and chemical materials on storage efficacy seed viability and quality under the environmental conditions of Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. The experiment was arranged in A Factorial Experiment in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications. The first factor contained three storage periods (3, 6 and 9 months). The second factor included four types of packages i.e normal storage (stored wheat grains in normal "twisting plastic" and gunny packages) and sealing storage (stored wheat grains in polyethylene "nylon" and metal containers). The third factor included five treatment of treating wheat grains with natural and chemical materials at the beginning of storage i.e control treatment (untreated grains), and treating wheat grains with thyme oil at the rate of 15%, neem oil at the rate of 20%, ascorbic acid at the rate of 500 ppm and phosphine at the rate of 8 ppm. The main results of this study could be summarized as follows: Increasing storage periods of wheat seed up to 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy and seed viability and quality. Sealing storage wheat grains in polyethylene "nylon" recorded the most excellent results of storage efficacy, seed viability and quality, followed by sealed stored in metal packages, then gunny packages and lastly in normal "twisting plastic". The best results of storage efficacy, seed viability and quality were recorded with treating wheat grains with phosphine at the rate of 8 ppm, followed by treating with neem oil at the rate of 20%, then treating with thyme oil at the rate of 15%, treating with ascorbic acid at the rate of 500 ppm and lastly control treatment (untreated grains). For enhancing storage efficacy, seed viability and quality, it could recommended that treating wheat grains with phosphine (as a chemical material) at the rate of 8 ppm or neem oil at the rate of 20% (as a natural material) before storage in polyethylene or metal packages under the environmental conditions of the experiment in Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing storage periods of wheat up to 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy, seed viability and quality.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Increasing storage periodse0
- Outcome
- storage efficacy and seed viability and qualitye0
- Setting
- Dakahlia Governorate, Egypte6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing storage periods of wheat seed up to 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy and seed viability and quality”
e6“under the environmental conditions of Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
Sealing storage of wheat grains in polyethylene nylon gave the most excellent storage efficacy, seed viability and quality.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Sealing storage wheat grains in polyethylene "nylon"e1
- Outcome
- results of storage efficacy, seed viability and qualitye1
- Direction
- most excellente1
- Comparator
- normal "twisting plastic"e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sealing storage wheat grains in polyethylene "nylon" recorded the most excellent results of storage efficacy, seed viability and quality”
e2“lastly in normal "twisting plastic"”
Claim · model-written summary
Treating wheat grains with phosphine at 8 ppm gave the best storage efficacy, seed viability and quality.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- treating wheat grains with phosphine at the rate of 8 ppme2
- Outcome
- storage efficacy, seed viability and qualitye2
- Direction
- best resultse2
- Comparator
- control treatment (untreated grains)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The best results of storage efficacy, seed viability and quality were recorded with treating wheat grains with phosphine at the rate of 8 ppm”
e4“lastly control treatment (untreated grains)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treating wheat grains with neem oil at 20 % was followed in effect by a second-best storage result.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- treating with neem oil at the rate of 20%e3
- Outcome
- storage efficacy, seed viability and qualitye2
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Comparator
- control treatment (untreated grains)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The best results of storage efficacy, seed viability and quality were recorded with treating wheat grains with phosphine at the rate of 8 ppm”
e3“followed by treating with neem oil at the rate of 20%”
e4“lastly control treatment (untreated grains)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treating wheat grains with phosphine at 8 ppm or neem oil at 20 % is recommended before storage for enhanced storage efficacy, seed viability and quality.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume5
- Outcome
- treating wheat grains with phosphinee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“For enhancing storage efficacy, seed viability and quality, it could recommended that treating wheat grains with phosphine (as a chemical material) at the rate of 8 ppm or neem oil at the rate of 20%”
The same questions in other papers
storage · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
botanical · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.