Paper · 2016 · Progress in Plant Protection

Harmfulness of Fusarium crookwellense Burgess, Nelson & Toussoun to panicles of selected genotypes of oat (Avena sativa L.) concerning the content of mycotoxins in grain

Elżbieta Mielniczuk; Irena Kiecana; Małgorzata Cegiełko; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study was conducted on nine oat genotypes in the experimental plots in south-eastern part of Poland in the years 2014–2015. Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015, while decrease in grain yield amounted to 38.96% and 21.76% respectively, and 1000 grain weight 12.72% and 6.02% respectively. The presence of nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes. The mean concentration of these metabolites in the years 2014 and 2015 ranged respectively: 1.764 and 0.085 mg/kg, 0.050 and 0.027 mg/kg, 0.017 and 0.009 mg/kg, and 0.066 and 0.024 mg/kg. The presence of zearalenone was detected in the grain of some oat genotypes. Badania przeprowadzono w latach 2014–2015, na polach doświadczalnych w południowo-wschodniej Polsce. Materiał infekcyjny stanowiła zawiesina konidiów Fusarium crookwellense nr 72. Średnia obniżka liczby ziarniaków w wiesze, w porównaniu do kontroli wynosiła w 2014 r. 31,66%, zaś w 2015 r. 21,52%, natomiast redukcja plonu ziarna wynosiła odpowiednio 38,96% i 21,76%, zaś obniżka masy 1000 ziaren odpowiednio 12,72% i 6,02%. W próbach ziarna wszystkich genotypów owsa stwierdzono obecność niwalenolu, deoksyniwalenolu, 3-Ac DON oraz fuzarenonu X, średnie stężenie tych metabolitów w latach 2014 i 2015 wynosiło odpowiednio: 1,764 i 0,085 mg/kg, 0,050 i 0,027 mg/kg, 0,017 i 0,009 mg/kg oraz 0,066 i 0,024 mg/kg. Ponadto w ziarnie niektórych genotypów owsa stwierdzono obecność zearalenonu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced oat grains per panicle by 31.66% in 2014.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
number of grain per paniclee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31.66%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced oat grains per panicle by 21.52% in 2015.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
number of grain per paniclee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
21.52%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grain yield decreased 38.96% in 2014.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
38.96%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015, while decrease in grain yield amounted to 38.96% and 21.76% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grain yield decreased 21.76% in 2015.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
21.76%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015, while decrease in grain yield amounted to 38.96% and 21.76% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat 1000 grain weight decreased 12.72% in 2014.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
12.72%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015, while decrease in grain yield amounted to 38.96% and 21.76% respectively, and 1000 grain weight 12.72% and 6.02% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat 1000 grain weight decreased 6.02% in 2015.

Taxon
oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72e0
Interactor
Fusarium crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
6.02%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat panicles were inoculated with conidial suspension of Fusarium crookwellense no. 72. The mean reduction in the number of grain per panicle compared to the control was 31.66% in 2014 and 21.52% in 2015, while decrease in grain yield amounted to 38.96% and 21.76% respectively, and 1000 grain weight 12.72% and 6.02% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nivalenol, deoxynivalenol and 3-Ac DON were detected in grain of all oat genotypes.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
presence of nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
fusarenone X was detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nivalenol averaged 1.764 mg/kg in 2014 and 0.085 mg/kg in 2015.

Outcome
nivalenole1
Value
1.764 and 0.085 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean concentration of these metabolites in the years 2014 and 2015 ranged respectively: 1.764 and 0.085 mg/kg, 0.050 and 0.027 mg/kg, 0.017 and 0.009 mg/kg, and 0.066 and 0.024 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deoxynivalenol averaged 0.050 mg/kg in 2014 and 0.027 mg/kg in 2015.

Outcome
deoxynivalenole1
Value
0.050 and 0.027 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean concentration of these metabolites in the years 2014 and 2015 ranged respectively: 1.764 and 0.085 mg/kg, 0.050 and 0.027 mg/kg, 0.017 and 0.009 mg/kg, and 0.066 and 0.024 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3-Ac DON averaged 0.017 mg/kg in 2014 and 0.009 mg/kg in 2015.

Outcome
3-Ac DONe1
Value
0.017 and 0.009 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean concentration of these metabolites in the years 2014 and 2015 ranged respectively: 1.764 and 0.085 mg/kg, 0.050 and 0.027 mg/kg, 0.017 and 0.009 mg/kg, and 0.066 and 0.024 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarenone X averaged 0.066 mg/kg in 2014 and 0.024 mg/kg in 2015.

Outcome
fusarenone Xe1
Value
0.066 and 0.024 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean concentration of these metabolites in the years 2014 and 2015 ranged respectively: 1.764 and 0.085 mg/kg, 0.050 and 0.027 mg/kg, 0.017 and 0.009 mg/kg, and 0.066 and 0.024 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-Ac DON and fusarenone X was detected in grain of all oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zearalenone was detected in grain of some oat genotypes.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
presence of zearalenonee0
Qualifier
some oat genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of zearalenone was detected in the grain of some oat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–836 · show in text ↑

Fusarium cerealis · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.