Paper · 1996 · Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly JARQ

First Occurrence of Sudden Death Syndrome of Soybean in Brazil

Takashi Nakajima; Takao Mitsueda; and Maria Jose D'Avila Charchar

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sudden death syndrome (SDS) of soybean was observed in a field in Brasilia DF, Brazil in the 1992 growing season, which was cool and wet. Initial symptoms consitsted of chlorotic spots which became necrotic or developed into chlorotic streaks, and the leaflet veins remained green, Fusarium solani with blue pigment was isolated from the diseased plants at a high percentage. Inoculation of the pathogen resulted in the development of typical interveinal chlorotic spots on the leaves and the fungus was reisolated from the diseased roots. Koch’s postulates were fulfilled. Common bean was more susceptible than soybean in artificial inoculation test. This is the first report of SDS of soybean in Brazil and first observation in South America. Discipline: Plant disease Additional key words: Fusarium solani, Glycine max, common bean, pathogenicity

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean sudden death syndrome occurred in a cool, wet field season in Brasilia, Brazil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Sudden death syndrome (SDS)e0
Qualifier
1992 growing season, which was cool and wete0
Setting
Brasilia DF, Brazile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sudden death syndrome (SDS) of soybean was observed in a field in Brasilia DF, Brazil in the 1992 growing season, which was cool and wet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected soybean leaflets developed chlorotic spots, necrosis or chlorotic streaks while veins remained green.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leaflete0
Outcome
chlorotic spots which became necrotic or developed into chlorotic streaks, and the leaflet veins remained greene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial symptoms consitsted of chlorotic spots which became necrotic or developed into chlorotic streaks, and the leaflet veins remained green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium solani with blue pigment was frequently isolated from diseased soybean plants.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium solani with blue pigment was isolated from the diseased plants at a high percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium solani with blue pigment was isolated from the diseased plants at a high percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation produced typical interveinal chlorotic spots on soybean leaves and the fungus was reisolated from roots.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Inoculation of the pathogene0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie1pathogen
Outcome
typical interveinal chlorotic spots on the leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of the pathogen resulted in the development of typical interveinal chlorotic spots on the leaves and the fungus was reisolated from the diseased roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium solani with blue pigment was isolated from the diseased plants at a high percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–374 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus was reisolated from diseased soybean roots after inoculation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie1pathogen
Outcome
fungus was reisolated from the diseased rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungus was reisolated from the diseased roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium solani with blue pigment was isolated from the diseased plants at a high percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean was more susceptible than soybean in an artificial inoculation test.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
artificial inoculatione0
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean was more susceptible than soybean in artificial inoculation test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This was the first report of soybean sudden death syndrome in Brazil and South America.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
first report of SDS of soybeane0
Setting
Brazile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This is the first report of SDS of soybean in Brazil and first observation in South America”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–743 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 28 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.