Paper · 2017 · The Agriculturists

Performance of Wheat as Affected by Different Irrigation Levels and Sowing Dates

Md Sohel Mahmud; Md Jafar Ullah; Md Abdullahil Baque; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to determine the effect of irrigations and sowing dates on growth and yield performance of wheat in the experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period of November 18, 2012 to March 30, 2013. The experiment was comprised of two factors, viz. factor A: two irrigations namely irrigation (I) and no irrigation i.e. control (I0), and factor B: three sowing dates such as S1: 1st sowing on 18 November, S2: 2nd sowing on 03 December and S3: 3rd sowing on 18 December. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications. Irrigation was assigned in the main plot, while sowing time was in the sub-plots. Data on grain yield and different yield contributing characters were taken after harvest. Results indicated that the highest grain yield was obtained with I (2.915 t ha-1) and S1 (2.983 t ha-1). The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat.The Agriculturists 2016; 14(2) 77-85

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation produced the highest wheat grain yield, 2.915 t ha-1.

Treatment
Ie0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.915 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that the highest grain yield was obtained with I (2.915 t ha-1) and S1 (2.983 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 18 November produced the highest wheat grain yield, 2.983 t ha-1.

Treatment
S1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.983 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that the highest grain yield was obtained with I (2.915 t ha-1) and S1 (2.983 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined irrigation and sowing on 18 November produced maximum wheat yield of 3.387t ha-1.

Treatment
irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.387t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined irrigation and sowing on 18 November produced wheat spike length of 17.08 cm at the maximum yield.

Treatment
irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1)e0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.08 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined irrigation and sowing on 18 November produced wheat 1000 grain weight of 43.4 g at the maximum yield.

Treatment
irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1)e0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
43.4 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined irrigation and sowing on 18 November produced 20.03 wheat spikelets spike-1 at the maximum yield.

Treatment
irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1)e0
Outcome
spikelets spike-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
20.03e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined irrigation and sowing on 18 November produced 65.58 wheat grain spike-1 at the maximum yield.

Treatment
irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1)e0
Outcome
grain spike-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.58e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of irrigation (I) and sowing on 18 November (S1) showed the maximum yield (3.387t ha-1), spike length (17.08 cm), 1000 grain weight (43.4 g), spikelets spike-1 (20.03) and grain spike-1 (65.58) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1113 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.