Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Weed Management in Cowpea-A Review

Taramani Yadav Nisha, K. Chopra; N.K. Chopra M.R. Yadav; Rakesh Kumar D.K. Rathore; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

India is the largest producer and consumer of the pulses in world. There is a huge shortage of pulses in the country to meet out the domestic demand especially of vegetarian population. The low production and productivity of pulses under Indian condition is mainly due to several biotic and abiotic constraints. In general, the pulses crops are more susceptible to the stresses including weeds as compare to the cereals and oilseeds. It was widely reported that yield losses due to weeds especially in the pulses are more than the loss caused either by insect-pest or diseases. Besides, pulses crops are treated on low priority compared to the cereals. Little attention has been given in the past by researchers also for developing effective and efficient strategies for weed management in this group of crops. Being a protein rich crop, Cowpeas is one of the most important food legume crops in the arid and semiarid tropics of the world. Due to its drought-tolerant characteristics, cowpea is known to well-adapted to the drier regions of the tropics, where other food legumes do not perform well. It also has the useful ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through its root nodules. Weeds posses’ a severe problem in cowpea production and, if it is not managed with best management practices, can serve as hibernating agent for pests and reduce not only yield but also quality of the seed and fodder yield. Bing a poor competitor with weeds and its cultivation during monsoon season, the cowpea known to infested with a wider range of weeds especially at the initial stage of growth. Based on the location, soil type, verities and agronomic management the reduction in the yield due to weeds in cowpea is in the range of 12.7 as high as 60.0%.Weed control methods employed depends on the nature of the weed problem and the means available with the farmer to control them efficiently. In general, the problem of weed infestation in cowpea is more severe at the initial period (5-8 weeks). Chemical weed control alone or in conjugation with manual weeding is most promising, although there are cultural options like intercropping, crop rotation, closer spacing, tillage, etc. which could reduce the weed infestation in cowpea. Due to its smothering capacity, its intercropping with other legumes and cereals proved to be reducing the problem of the weeds leading to higher grain yield and dry fodder yield than in sole crop. Integration of the components of production technologies enhanced the productivity of cowpea which ultimately resulted into higher net returns to the farmers. Therefore, an attempt has been made in this article to review works done on several aspects of weed management in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds reduce cowpea yield by 12.7 to 60.0% depending on location, soil, varieties and management.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
reduction in the yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
12.7 as high as 60.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in the yield due to weeds in cowpea is in the range of 12.7 as high as 60.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1744 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation in cowpea is more severe during the initial 5-8 weeks.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
more severee0
Value
5-8 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the problem of weed infestation in cowpea is more severe at the initial period (5-8 weeks)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–1988 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control alone or with manual weeding is presented as the most promising cowpea control approach.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
Chemical weed control alone or in conjugation with manual weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical weed control alone or in conjugation with manual weeding is most promising”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cowpea with other legumes and cereals reduced weeds and raised grain and dry fodder yield relative to sole cropping.

Treatment
intercropping with other legumes and cerealse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yield and dry fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its intercropping with other legumes and cereals proved to be reducing the problem of the weeds leading to higher grain yield and dry fodder yield than in sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated production technologies enhanced cowpea productivity.

Treatment
Integration of the components of production technologiese0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of the components of production technologies enhanced the productivity of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2425–2517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated production technologies brought higher net returns to cowpea farmers.

Treatment
Integration of the components of production technologiese0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of the components of production technologies enhanced the productivity of cowpea which ultimately resulted into higher net returns to the farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2425–2582 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.