Paper · 1986 · Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research

On the weeding effect of cultivation and weeding operation at vegetable cropping. III Development of the crop growth model under competition against weed and its application to autumn-sown chinese cabbage.

Osamu SAKAUE

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improved plant growth model under the competition between the plant and weed was tried to develop in order to expect the maximum plant yield with the minimum labor.Following differential equation was formularized as the plant growth model which describes basically logistic curve.dy/dt={M-a·y+f(y)}y{1-ho(y)/r·g(t)/go(t)}where, y: the weight of the plantt: time from the plantingM/a: estimated maximum growth weight, yef(y): collection term of quadratic equation of y approximated by the expression of b (y-c) (y-d)ho(y): the inhibition function of the weed approximated by the expression of u(y-v)(y-ye)r: the relative growth rate, M-a·y+f(y)g(t): the weight of the weed approximated by the expression of A·tBgo(t): the weight of the weed at non-weeding treatment plot approximated by the expression of Ao·tBOVarious optimum parameter values were obtained from the estimated plant growth values decided on the growth data of chinese cabbage cultivated in fall, 1979 to input in to the plant growth model equation and caluculate by the electronic computer using the solusion of the Runge-Kutta method for evaluating the numerical values of differential equation.The caluculated value of the each weeding treatment plot agreed well with the estimated value of it, however, measured value of the mechanical weeding treatment plot was rather smaller than the caluculated value of it. This is caused by the existance of a lot of plant-spacing weed which was not able to be removed by the machine and inhibited the plant growth more seriously. a lot of plant-spacing weed which was not able to be removed by the machine and inhibited the plant growth more seriously.The growth rate of each weeding treatment plot described mountaineous curves which had maximum values at the point of about 60th day after the planting, and then there were scarecely difference of the two between the three-time weeding treatments and the four-time treatments by the machine.The acceleration of the plant growth which is obtained from the differential calculus of the plant growth rate was larger at about 35th to 55th day after the planting. Therefore, the precision weeding treatment at this time may bring the increase effect of the plant yield.The opimum weeding operation system in this case was as follows;21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanicalwhich brings 5610gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield. This is more than 99 percent of 5650gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield estimated from non-weed-four-time manual weeding treatment plot and 25 percent increase of 4460 gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield estimated from non-weeding treatment plot. It is author's conclusion that this plant growth model discussed here is the effective method to estimate the suitable weeding time and optimum weeding mean as the objective function of the maximum plant yield, and ultimately contributes to the improvement of weeding operation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The calculated growth of each weeding treatment plot agreed well with the estimated value.

Outcome
caluculated valuee2
Direction
agreed welle2
Comparator
estimated valuee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“The caluculated value of the each weeding treatment plot agreed well with the estimated value of it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured yield of the mechanical weeding plot was rather smaller than the calculated value.

Treatment
mechanical weeding treatmente3
Outcome
measured valuee3
Direction
smallere3
Comparator
caluculated valuee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e3

“measured value of the mechanical weeding treatment plot was rather smaller than the caluculated value of it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1379 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-spacing weeds that the machine could not remove inhibited cabbage growth more seriously, which the authors give as the cause of the smaller measured value.

Interactor
plant-spacing weede4weed
Outcome
plant growthe4
Qualifier
not able to be removed by the machinee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e4

“This is caused by the existance of a lot of plant-spacing weed which was not able to be removed by the machine and inhibited the plant growth more seriously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth rate of each weeding treatment plot had maximum values at about the 60th day after planting.

Outcome
growth ratee5
Direction
maximum valuese5
Qualifier
at the point of about 60th day after the plantinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth rate of each weeding treatment plot described mountaineous curves which had maximum values at the point of about 60th day after the planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth rate showed scarcely any difference between the three-time and four-time machine weeding treatments.

Treatment
three-time weeding treatmentse6
Outcome
growth ratee5
Direction
scarecely differencee6
Comparator
four-time treatments by the machinee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e6

“there were scarecely difference of the two between the three-time weeding treatments and the four-time treatments by the machine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1951 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth rate of each weeding treatment plot described mountaineous curves which had maximum values at the point of about 60th day after the planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acceleration of plant growth was larger at about 35 to 55 days after planting.

Outcome
acceleration of the plant growthe7
Direction
largere7
Qualifier
at about 35th to 55th day after the plantinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e7

“The acceleration of the plant growth which is obtained from the differential calculus of the plant growth rate was larger at about 35th to 55th day after the planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Precision weeding at this time may increase cabbage yield.

Treatment
precision weeding treatment at this timee1
Outcome
increase effect of the plant yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, the precision weeding treatment at this time may bring the increase effect of the plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum weeding system (mechanical at day 21, manual at day 35, mechanical at day 49) gives a simulated yield of 5610 gf/0.6 m2.

Treatment
21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanicale1
Outcome
plant yielde2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
5610gf/0.6m2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2399 · show in text ↑
e2

“which brings 5610gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2399–2443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum weeding system gives a simulated yield that is more than 99 percent of the four-time manual weeding plot (5650 gf/0.6 m2).

Treatment
21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanicale1
Outcome
plant yielde2
Direction
more thane2
Value
more than 99 percente2
Comparator
non-weed-four-time manual weeding treatment plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2399 · show in text ↑
e2

“This is more than 99 percent of 5650gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield estimated from non-weed-four-time manual weeding treatment plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2445–2572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum weeding system gives a simulated yield 25 percent above the non-weeding plot (4460 gf/0.6 m2).

Treatment
21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanicale1
Outcome
plant yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
25 percente2
Qualifier
4460 gf/0.6m2 of the plant yielde2
Comparator
non-weeding treatment plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“21th day after the planting-mechanical35th day after the planting-manual49th day after the planting-mechanical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2399 · show in text ↑
e2

“25 percent increase of 4460 gf/0.6m2 of the plant yield estimated from non-weeding treatment plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2577–2674 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the growth model is an effective method to estimate suitable weeding time and optimum weeding means for maximum yield.

Outcome
estimate the suitable weeding time and optimum weeding meane1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“autumn-sown chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is author's conclusion that this plant growth model discussed here is the effective method to estimate the suitable weeding time and optimum weeding mean as the objective function of the maximum plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2676–2885 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.