Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Sorghum Research Unit Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola to study the effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity. The experiment was carried out during the kharif season of 2009 to 2011 in Split plot design in three replications. The treatments were as main plot -tillage practices(3) T1: Conventional tillage (1 summer ploughing before monsoon) + 2 harrowing + atrazine as pre-em + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding), T2: Reduced tillage (2 harrowing + atrazine as pre-em + 1 hand weeding) and T3: Minimum tillage (1 harrowing + atrazine as pre-em + 1 hand weeding) and each main plot sub divided into four Nutrient management practices-F1-100% RDF through inorganic, F 2-75% RDF through inorganic + 5t FYM/ha, F 3-50% RDF through inorganic + 5t FYM/ha + Azotobactor + PSB and F 4 -Control (Native fertility). From the three years data it is concluded that conventional tillage practice produced significantly highest plant height grain, fodder yield which was at par with reduced tillage practice. Application of 100% RDF through inorganic sources produced significantly highest grain, fodder yield which was at par with the application of 75% RDF through inorganic + 5 t FYM/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave significantly the highest plant height, grain yield and fodder yield.
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity”
e1“conventional tillage practice produced significantly highest plant height grain, fodder yield which was at par with reduced tillage practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage gave grain and fodder yields at par with conventional tillage.
- Treatment
- conventional tillage practicee1
- Outcome
- grain, fodder yielde1
- Direction
- at pare1
- Comparator
- reduced tillage practicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity”
e1“conventional tillage practice produced significantly highest plant height grain, fodder yield which was at par with reduced tillage practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 100% RDF through inorganic sources gave significantly the highest grain and fodder yields.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity”
e2“Application of 100% RDF through inorganic sources produced significantly highest grain, fodder yield which was at par with the application of 75% RDF through inorganic + 5 t FYM/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 100% RDF through inorganic sources gave grain and fodder yields at par with 75% RDF plus 5 t FYM/ha.
- Treatment
- 100% RDF through inorganic sourcese2
- Outcome
- grain, fodder yielde2
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- 75% RDF through inorganic + 5 t FYM/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity”
e2“Application of 100% RDF through inorganic sources produced significantly highest grain, fodder yield which was at par with the application of 75% RDF through inorganic + 5 t FYM/ha”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ
101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.