Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

INFLUENCE OF POSTHARVEST STORAGE ON APPEARANCE CHANGES IN FRESH-CUT CANTALOUPE

M. Zainal Abidin; R. Shamsudin; O. Zaulia

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The degree of fruit ripeness during postharvest storage considerably affects the biochemical properties of fresh-cut product. Appearance and texture are two important properties affecting the quality of fresh-cut fruit during purchasing activity. In this study, colour and firmness of fresh-cut cantaloupe processed after different postharvest storage durations were observed to evaluate the quality retention of the product. Untreated and 1% calcium chloride treated samples were used to investigate the effectiveness of calcium salt as a firming agent in fresh-cut cantaloupe. Prepared samples were stored at 2°C and 87% relative humidity (RH) for 19 days to evaluate chromaticity, hue angle, and firmness. As expected, the firmness of the treated samples remained unchanged throughout storage. The hue angle of both samples was not affected by the treatment and storage duration while the chromaticity of the treated sample was significantly lower than the control. Different postharvest storage durations also did not cause any quality changes in both samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness of calcium chloride treated fresh-cut cantaloupe remained unchanged during storage.

Treatment
treated samplese0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
remained unchangede0
Qualifier
throughout storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As expected, the firmness of the treated samples remained unchanged throughout storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride treatment and storage duration did not affect hue angle.

Treatment
the treatment and storage duratione0
Outcome
hue anglee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hue angle of both samples was not affected by the treatment and storage duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromaticity of treated cantaloupe was significantly lower than the control.

Treatment
treated samplee0
Outcome
chromaticitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chromaticity of the treated sample was significantly lower than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different postharvest storage durations did not change quality in either sample group.

Treatment
Different postharvest storage durationse0
Outcome
quality changese0
Direction
did not cause anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different postharvest storage durations also did not cause any quality changes in both samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.