Abstract
Objectives: Study of reducing the rates of a new generation herbicide verdict in combination with some biocontrol components under the field condition of Moscow to suppress Avena fatua and broad-leaved weeds and consequently maintaining satisfactory crop yield under intensive technology. Method/Statistical analysis: Field experiment were laid out to appraise the efficacy of reduced concentrations of a post-emergence herbicide verdict in combination with biocontrol agent to suppress three major weeds (Chenopodium album, Avena fatua and Capsella bursa-pastoris) in wheat field under the condition of Non-chernozem zone, Moscow region. Findings: Shown labeled concentration 0.3 kg/ha-1 + bio-agents was effective in reducing total weed populations. This study showed that a desirable weed reduction in wheat was achieved when intermediate herbicide rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 and bio-agents were used, that was comparable to the result which achieved for registered verdict dose as 0.5 kg/ha-1. Hence, despite the higher weed reduction efficacy was obtained with herbicide in registered label dose plus biocontrol agent, but the differences were not significant in comparison with below herbicide dose 0.3 kg/ha-1. Meanwhile, the best energy output (90.3 GDj/ha-1), agricultural efficiency (19.9%) and wheat grain yield 7.80 t/ha-1 were achieved when reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agent were applied.Application /Improvement: Cutting of herbicide dosage without compromising grain yield can cause to less environmental pollution and lower production costs, besides, can reduce weed population desirably.Keywords: Agronomical Efficiency, Energy Output, Reduced Herbicide Rate, Weed, Wheat Yield
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The 0.3 kg/ha-1 herbicide rate plus bio-agents reduced total weed populations.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 0.3 kg/ha-1 + bio-agentse0
- Outcome
- total weed populationse0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“labeled concentration 0.3 kg/ha-1 + bio-agents was effective in reducing total weed populations.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed reduction at 0.3 kg/ha-1 with bio-agents was comparable to the registered 0.5 kg/ha-1 dose.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- herbicide rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 and bio-agentse0
- Outcome
- weed reductione0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- registered verdict dose as 0.5 kg/ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a desirable weed reduction in wheat was achieved when intermediate herbicide rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 and bio-agents were used, that was comparable to the result which achieved for registered verdict dose as 0.5 kg/ha-1.”
Claim · model-written summary
The registered dose plus biocontrol agent gave higher weed reduction efficacy than the reduced dose, without a significant difference.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- herbicide in registered label dose plus biocontrol agente0
- Outcome
- weed reduction efficacye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- below herbicide dose 0.3 kg/ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher weed reduction efficacy was obtained with herbicide in registered label dose plus biocontrol agent, but the differences were not significant in comparison with below herbicide dose 0.3 kg/ha-1.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduced rate combined with bio-agent gave the best energy output, 90.3 GDj/ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agente0
- Outcome
- energy outpute0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 90.3 GDj/ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best energy output (90.3 GDj/ha-1), agricultural efficiency (19.9%) and wheat grain yield 7.80 t/ha-1 were achieved when reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agent were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduced rate combined with bio-agent gave the best agricultural efficiency, 19.9%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agente0
- Outcome
- agricultural efficiencye0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 19.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best energy output (90.3 GDj/ha-1), agricultural efficiency (19.9%) and wheat grain yield 7.80 t/ha-1 were achieved when reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agent were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduced rate combined with bio-agent gave the best wheat grain yield, 7.80 t/ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agente0
- Outcome
- wheat grain yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 7.80 t/ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best energy output (90.3 GDj/ha-1), agricultural efficiency (19.9%) and wheat grain yield 7.80 t/ha-1 were achieved when reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agent were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend cutting herbicide dosage to reduce pollution and costs while maintaining yield and reducing weeds.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Cutting of herbicide dosagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cutting of herbicide dosage without compromising grain yield can cause to less environmental pollution and lower production costs, besides, can reduce weed population desirably.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
label · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
biocontrol · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
biocontrol · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
397 papers more in this group
See all 401 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.