Abstract
Abelmuschus esculentus (L.) Moench,is the vegetable that popular in Malaysia which originated from India. These plants are easy to grow and give fruit production in short time. The experiment was designed as 2 x 3 factorial design experiment. In this experiment, okra are in complete block variety with plant density which is 25cm x 50cm (D1) and 50cm x 50cm (D2). The growth of okra were compared in different media which is 1:1 topsoil:sand (M1); 1:1 topsoil:coco peat (M2); and hundred percent coco peat (M3). Hence the objectives of this study were to determine the best planting density and growing media on growth and fruit production okra. The result showed that the planting density was not significantly affecting growth and fruit production, while in the growing media, there were significantly affecting in number of leaf, number of branch, and diameter at specific week. There was significantly difference affecting the number of leaf, number of branch and growth of fruit in the relations between planting density with growing media. Seedling in D1 give the highest reading in all the growth performance of plants in their height, diameter, number of branch,number of leaf, total leaf area and shoots as biomass. Meanwhile in reading of fruits growth, D2 give the highest reading. Moreover, in growing media, M1 give the best reading of growth performance in height, diameter, number of leaf, total leaf area and biomass. In fruit performance growth, M3 gave the highest result. As the conclusion, D1 and M1 is the best planting and growing media for the growth of okra. While, D1 and M3 is the best planting density and growing media for fruit production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Planting density did not significantly affect okra growth.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- planting densitye0
- Outcome
- growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the planting density was not significantly affecting growth and fruit production”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting density did not significantly affect okra fruit production.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- planting densitye0
- Outcome
- fruit productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the planting density was not significantly affecting growth and fruit production”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing media significantly affected leaf number, branch number and diameter.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- growing mediae0
- Outcome
- number of leaf, number of branch, and diametere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the growing media, there were significantly affecting in number of leaf, number of branch, and diameter”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Density and medium interaction significantly affected leaf number, branch number and fruit growth.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- planting density with growing mediae0
- Outcome
- number of leaf, number of branch and growth of fruite0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was significantly difference affecting the number of leaf, number of branch and growth of fruit in the relations between planting density with growing media”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
D1 gave the highest height, diameter and branch number.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- D1e0
- Outcome
- height, diameter, number of branche0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seedling in D1 give the highest reading in all the growth performance of plants in their height, diameter, number of branch”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
D1 gave the highest leaf number, total leaf area and shoot biomass.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- D1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaf, total leaf area and shoots as biomasse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seedling in D1 give the highest reading in all the growth performance of plants in their height, diameter, number of branch,number of leaf, total leaf area and shoots as biomass”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
D2 gave the highest fruit growth reading.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- D2e0
- Outcome
- fruits growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in reading of fruits growth, D2 give the highest reading”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
M1 gave the best height, diameter and leaf number.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- M1e0
- Outcome
- height, diameter, number of leafe0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M1 give the best reading of growth performance in height, diameter, number of leaf”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
M1 gave the best total leaf area and biomass.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- M1e0
- Outcome
- total leaf area and biomasse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M1 give the best reading of growth performance in height, diameter, number of leaf, total leaf area and biomass”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
M3 gave the highest fruit performance.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- M3e0
- Outcome
- fruit performance growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In fruit performance growth, M3 gave the highest result”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors favor D1 and M1 for okra growth.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- D1 and M1 is the best planting and growing media for the growthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“D1 and M1 is the best planting and growing media for the growth of okra”
t0“fruit production of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors favor D1 and M3 for fruit production.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- D1 and M3 is the best planting density and growing media for fruit productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“D1 and M3 is the best planting density and growing media for fruit production”
t0“fruit production of okra”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →density · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.