Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Daily irrigation at 45 cm lateral spacing gave better okra growth performance than other treatments.

A claim from Production of subsurface drip-irrigated okra under different lateral spacings and irrigation frequencies · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily irrigation at 45 cm lateral spacing gave better okra growth performance than other treatments.

Treatment
daily irrigation at 45 cm lateral spacinge0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse1
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsurface drip irrigation with daily irrigation at 45 cm lateral spacing gives better performance than all other treatments in sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–957
e1

“plant growth parameters, efficiency and yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–790

Title

Production of subsurface drip-irrigated okra under different lateral spacings and irrigation frequencies

Narender Kumar; Sanjay Kumar; Darshana Duhan; et al. Water SA 2023. doi:10.17159/wsa/2023.v49.i2.3990

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-db486afdc1406428eafeb9f4837b6d76342c7334e24fe4d1b4d66db7d51bb774 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    High okra density in the intercrop reduced okra leaf production and leaf area index.

    Productivity of cassava/okra intercropping systems as influenced by okra planting density · 2007

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Planting density did not affect okra height.

    Planting density on weed suppression and yield of okra · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Okra growth was comparable across planting densities with both cultivars in both seasons.

    COMPARISON OF WEED SUPPRESSION ABILITY AND YIELD OF TWO OKRA CULTIVARS AND WITH DIFFERENT PLANTING DENSITY · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Planting density did not significantly affect okra growth.

    Effect of planting density and growing media on growth and fruit production of okra (abelmuschus esculentus (L.)moench) · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Plant height showed no significant spacing difference in 2017.

    EFFECT OF INTRA ROW SPACING AND VARIETY ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF OKRA (Abelmuschus esculentus L. Moench) IN BAUCHI, BAUCHI STATE, NIGERIA · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Biofertilizer application at 1.00 x 0.50 m and 1.20 x 0.50 m spacing increased okra leaf area.

    Influence of spacing and application of biofertilizer on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) · 2018

    Same direction

  7. positive
    High nitrogen and wider spacing gave maximum plant height.

    Response of different levels of nitrogen, spacing and green fruit picking on growth, fruit yield, seed yield and seed quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench) · 2012

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Low plant density produced greater okra vegetative growth than high density.

    Effect of Different Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Under Varying Plant Geometry on Growth and Yield of Okra [Abelmoschus Esculentus (L.) Moench] · 2008 · compared with high plant density (50 x 30 cm)

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

irrigation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Deficit irrigation reduced okra aboveground biomass by 20–79%.

    Pod quality, yields responses and water productivity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) as affected by plant growth regulators and deficit irrigation · 2023

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Irrigation and soil types did not significantly affect okra germination.

    Effects of Irrigation and Soil Types on the Germination and Growth of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) · 2015

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation reduced seed germination from 98% in T1 to 53% in T4.

    Study on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) Response to Salt Stress Environment under Kabul Climatic Conditions, Afghanistan · 2021 · compared with T1

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increasing irrigation water salinity from 0.4 dS m−1 reduced plant growth of okra.

    Foliar Application of Selenium in Mitigating Salinity Stress on the Physiology, Growth, and Yield of Okra · 2025 · compared with 0.4 dS m−1

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Irrigation treatments had no significant effect on okra plant height

    Performance of Okra(Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) under Different Irrigation Frequencies · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Irrigation increased okra vegetative growth over unirrigated controls.

    Effect of Irrigation on the Growth and Yield of Okra · 1987 · compared with unirrigated control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    APRI with black plastic mulch produced maximum plant growth with less water than unmulched APRI and FRI.

    Evaluating partial root-zone irrigation and mulching in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) under a sub-humid tropical climate · 2011 · compared with APRI without BPM and FRI

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Full irrigation gave higher plant height than half irrigation.

    Foliar application of Tecamin max® to alleviate water deficit on vegetative growth and yield of okra · 2018 · compared with 50% level

    Same direction

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.