Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agripreneurship and Sustainable Development

EFFECT OF INTRA ROW SPACING AND VARIETY ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF OKRA (Abelmuschus esculentus L. Moench) IN BAUCHI, BAUCHI STATE, NIGERIA

Abdullahi, S. B.; Fagam, A. S.; Sabo, U. M.; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of intra row spacing and variety on the growth and yield of okra at the research farm of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Gubi Campus, Bauchi State, Nigeria during the 2016 and 2017 rainy seasons. The treatments consisted of 3 spacing (20, 30 and 40cm) and 3 varieties (Kirikou, Yar-kodom and Clemson spineless) which were factorially combined and laid-down in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The result of the experiment revealed significant difference (P≤0.05) in plant height, number of leaves, and number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, and yield per hectare. The use of wider intra row spacing significantly affected most of the parameters measured in the 2016 and 2017 except plant height that showed no significant difference in 2017. Among the varieties, assessed Clemson spineless consistently produced higher result on all measured characters and invariable higher yield. The interaction between intra row spacing and variety showed that the use of wider row spacing in combination with the varieties improved the plant height, stem girth and number of pods significantly. From the result obtained, it can be concluded that the use of wider spacing and improved varieties such as Clemson spineless can be adopted for okra production in Bauchi and its environs. The study recommended that farmers should adopt the use of wider intra-row spacing (30 cm and 40 cm) and Clemson spineless variety in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield traits differed significantly among spacing and variety treatments.

Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, and number of pods per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference (P≤0.05) in plant height, number of leaves, and number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider intra-row spacing significantly affected most measured parameters in both seasons.

Treatment
wider intra row spacinge0
Outcome
most of the parameters measurede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of wider intra row spacing significantly affected most of the parameters measured in the 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height showed no significant spacing difference in 2017.

Treatment
wider intra row spacinge1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except plant height that showed no significant difference in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of wider intra row spacing significantly affected most of the parameters measured in the 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clemson spineless had higher measured growth and yield characters than the other varieties.

Material
Clemson spinelesse0
Treatment
Clemson spinelesse0
Outcome
all measured characterse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clemson spineless consistently produced higher result on all measured characters and invariable higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing combined with varieties significantly improved plant height, stem girth and pod number.

Treatment
wider row spacing in combination with the varietiese0
Outcome
plant height, stem girth and number of podse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider row spacing in combination with the varieties improved the plant height, stem girth and number of pods significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 30 cm or 40 cm intra-row spacing and Clemson spineless for okra production in the study area.

Outcome
wider intra-row spacing (30 cm and 40 cm) and Clemson spineless varietye0
Setting
the study areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers should adopt the use of wider intra-row spacing (30 cm and 40 cm) and Clemson spineless variety in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

density · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 42 positive, 8 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.