Claim · model-written summary
Planting density did not affect okra height.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- planting densitye0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Okra plants were generally shorter in 2012 than in 2013, but height was not affected by planting density or cultivar in both years.”
t0“okra”
Title
Planting density on weed suppression and yield of okra
E. A. Makinde; O. R. Adeyemi; O. M. Odeyemi; et al. International Journal of Vegetable Science 2020. doi:10.1080/19315260.2020.1777495
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Okra plants were shorter in 2012 than in 2013.
- Observation Cultivar did not affect okra height.
- Observation Leaf number per plant was similar between okra cultivars.
- Intervention effect Increasing okra density reduced leaf number per plant.
- Intervention effect Leaf area was higher with one plant per stand in 2012.
- Intervention effect Leaf area was similar across higher densities in 2013.
- Observation NHAe 47-4 had greater plant height and leaf number.
- Observation LD 88 had higher cumulative pod yield than NHAe 47-4.
- Intervention effect LD 88 yielded more at three plants per stand.
- Intervention effect NHAe 47-4 yielded more at one or two plants per stand.
- Intervention effect Increasing planting density reduced okra growth and yield.
- Observation Weed growth did not differ between okra cultivars.
- Intervention effect Weed growth did not differ with planting density.
- Recommendation The authors recommend determining optimum planting density separately for each okra cultivar.