Paper · 1987 · HortScience

Effect of Irrigation on the Growth and Yield of Okra

B. P. Singh

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The effect of different amounts of irrigation on vegetative growth and fruit yield of okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus Moench) was determined in field experiments. Irrigation increased vegetative growth and fruit yield in okra in comparison to an unirrigated control. Similar increases in vegetative growth were produced at all irrigation amounts, ranging from 40% to 100% of pan evaporation (E pan ), but fruit yield differed with the amount of irrigation. Irrigation equal to 60% E pan produced maximum fruit yield, and significant decreases in yield were noted with an increase or decrease in the amount of irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased okra vegetative growth over unirrigated controls.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unirrigated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased vegetative growth and fruit yield in okra in comparison to an unirrigated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased okra fruit yield over unirrigated controls.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unirrigated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased vegetative growth and fruit yield in okra in comparison to an unirrigated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 40% to 100% pan evaporation, irrigation produced similar vegetative growth increases.

Treatment
all irrigation amountse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
Similar increasese0
Comparator
40% to 100% of pan evaporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar increases in vegetative growth were produced at all irrigation amounts, ranging from 40% to 100% of pan evaporation (E pan ), but fruit yield differed with the amount of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield differed among irrigation amounts.

Treatment
amount of irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield differed with the amount of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60% E pan maximized fruit yield.

Treatment
Irrigation equal to 60% E pane0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation equal to 60% E pan produced maximum fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating above or below 60% E pan significantly reduced fruit yield.

Treatment
increase or decrease in the amount of irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decreases in yield were noted with an increase or decrease in the amount of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.